Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > Trucks, Trailers and Transportation
A Little Fun with Wifey's Ecoboost >

A Little Fun with Wifey's Ecoboost

Notices

A Little Fun with Wifey's Ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-29-2012, 11:23 AM
  #21  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ezstriper
well the reason chevy has not done anything like the ecoboost is pretty simple...no need...the 5.3 package has the same gas mileage ratings, more torque cost less and better reliability than the turbo setup...have a friend who works for ford and drives F150's as demos tested both and in the real world get the same mileage in the 5.0 vs ecoboost. about the best thing about the ecoboost is the way Ford is marketing it...but look at the #'s...
Uhh wtf are you talking about? Even the 5.0 makes the 5.3 it's little b!tch. Ok so the 5.3 get's similar mileage as the eco, well the eco has a sh!tload more power and torque especially across a flat power band, that makes the 5.3 look even worse that a more powerful overall motor can do that and maintain mpg. And towing, ha, eco feels like a mini diesel and the 5.3 feels like a struggling V8 that needs a serious update. Eco will smoke it severely empty in a race, and in towing no comparison.
Quicksilver is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 11:35 AM
  #22  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quicksilver
Uhh wtf are you talking about? Even the 5.0 makes the 5.3 it's little b!tch. Ok so the 5.3 get's similar mileage as the eco, well the eco has a sh!tload more power and torque especially across a flat power band, that makes the 5.3 look even worse that a more powerful overall motor can do that and maintain mpg. And towing, ha, eco feels like a mini diesel and the 5.3 feels like a struggling V8 that needs a serious update. Eco will smoke it severely empty in a race, and in towing no comparison.
To be fair when the 5.3 came out it offered more hp than the 5.7 and for a V8 in the 1/2 class all around was a pretty good engine specially factoring its mpg. But that was 2007, its now five years later and Both dodge and ford have surpassed that engine all around.

But really its mentality at times, people have a hard time thinking a V-6 is better than a V8, alot of people have family loyalty to a brand. I know people who buy a Ford SD every 5 years because their dad did and their dad it, when clearly ford doesnt necessarily have the best SD type truck every model year. Companies spend a alot of money on branding and advertising just for this reason. Why do I buy Nike every time, when And One or no name shoes probably at times can be better or just as good. Branding.
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 03:46 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That Chevy 5.3 is basically on the same level as the old Ford 5.4s lol
Fordtough150 is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 04:19 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cardington Ohio
Posts: 4,188
Received 1,825 Likes on 714 Posts
Default

I think the 6 in the 150's are the same motors in the Taurus SHO's. I hear they're rockets and would love to drive one.
Twin O/B Sonic is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 04:28 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fordtough150
That Chevy 5.3 is basically on the same level as the old Ford 5.4s lol
Even worse if towing, at least the 5.4 had great low end grunt. The 5.3 always felt more like it's power was too high in the powerband. Case in point friend traded his 11' 1500 5.3 on an new F-150 5.0, just no comparison. Nevermind the Ford just rides, drives far better on the rough roads in CO. But the 5.3 felt barely adequate unladen through the mountains with 4 of us going to ski. He was totally against Ford, but one drive in the 5.0 had him sold. He loved the ecoboost but wanted the V8 and mainly it's sound lol, already has it modded.
Quicksilver is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 04:51 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Travis ,Texas
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marylandmark
My wife has a '13 Explorer Limited with the V6. The Eco-4 wasn't as impressive as its big brother and the Eco-6 isn't out in the Explorer yet.
http://blogs.musclemustangfastfords....xplorer-sport/
HTRDLNCN is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 07:02 AM
  #27  
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
 
Audiofn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Carlisle, MA USA
Posts: 18,422
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The only issue I see with the 150 EB is the price. 54K for a 150? I will hold off tell the start showing up used.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 07:27 AM
  #28  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Audiofn
The only issue I see with the 150 EB is the price. 54K for a 150? I will hold off tell the start showing up used.
Yeah for the decked out lariat. I got 95% loaded XLT for 32k after rebates buddy got a loaded Fx4 for 34 after rebates. Stickers on both of these trucks were 39 and 40 respectively.

And actually the 54k is the platinum version, I guess if you feel the need to have one of those.

I just went to ford and built a Lariat 4x4, super crew EB, for 44k.
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 07:31 AM
  #29  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Twin O/B Sonic
I think the 6 in the 150's are the same motors in the Taurus SHO's. I hear they're rockets and would love to drive one.
yes they are, except they may be tuned a little different. The same 6 is in the regular taurus and other cars just not turbod. The EB in other cars like the explorer is like 2.8 EB or something

Last edited by soldier4402; 08-30-2012 at 07:34 AM.
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 01:07 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
mcourson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Haven, IL
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been very happy with my 5.0L in my F150.

I added a bed cover and imco SIDO exhaust. On flat ground at 55-58mph I am pulling 24mpg. And I have hand calculated the computer several times and it is right on. Getting above 60mph it does start dropping off quite a bit.

Pulling my 24' old resin bucket, i get about 15-17 going the same speed. At 65mph, its about 13mpg.

my truck is 2011 F-150 Screw 4x4 with 5.5 bed and 3.55 rearend.

5 Star tuning makes several tunes for all 3 F-150 motors. After warranty is out, I will be getting one. I have read where his tunes make the 6.2 a complete monster.

Last edited by mcourson; 08-30-2012 at 01:07 PM. Reason: brain is faster then fingers
mcourson is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.