Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
292 with Big Blocks >

292 with Big Blocks

Notices
Formula

292 with Big Blocks

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-16-2010, 05:53 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 292 with Big Blocks

Are there any known Big Block conversions of 292's?

I was thinking about twin 496HO's in a 292. Probably 400 lbs more weight in the stern and approx 200hp more than the avarage 6,2.

What do you think of this?
Berglund is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 08:37 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: lake norman nc
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Berglund
Are there any known Big Block conversions of 292's?

I was thinking about twin 496HO's in a 292. Probably 400 lbs more weight in the stern and approx 200hp more than the avarage 6,2.

What do you think of this?
If I had the coin to upgrade to 496's over 6.2's I'd do it. No replacement for Displacement. The 6.2's are a solid 70 + mph boat but thats it. 496's should be in the 80 mph range.
mj2562@bellsouth.net is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 08:37 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 1,442
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

If you are referring to the newer Fastechs (twin step), none that I know of. IMO it is too much weight in the back of what is essentially a 27' boat (less swim platform). Rough water handling would not be good. If you are looking for 425 HP engines, build a couple small blocks. Same HP and no loss in handling.
4mulafastech is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 09:23 AM
  #4  
Registered
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 1000 Islands NY
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I heard dimensions only allow small blocks. Width wise I think they will fit but length wise I think is where there is a problem.
cuposterchild is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 09:40 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tonawanda NY
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You can't fit bb's in the newer 292's
88242LS is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 09:40 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 1,442
Received 19 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DareDevil
My old Formula 292 SR-1 had twin 454 mag and Bravo's..ran 76 MPH ..was factory...so i don't think there would be a problem even on the fast tech models !!!
I disagree, they are two different boats. The older SR-1 did not include the swim platform in the length and is a larger boat overall with more free board. Attached is a pic of my 2006 292 with twin 6.2's. I would have to read about a successful big block conversion for newer 292's to believe it is a good decision. I don't think it has ever been done. The race winning 292 Fastech had a single big block.
Attached Thumbnails 292 with Big Blocks-292.jpg  
4mulafastech is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 09:59 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: avon,ohio
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

after running my new to me 03 292 on lake erie for a day i would say no way to bb s 8ft 3in beam would be tight plus stearn heavy plenty of speed with 6.2s at least for lake erie chop chop chop
oh6662b is offline  
Old 05-16-2010, 12:58 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

check the width between the outdrives if there about 36' center to center big blocks will fit usually small blocks have 33' center tocenter of the out drives where width is a problem
humpster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.