3a versus no.6s
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: southampton uk
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3a versus no.6s
Hi
We have ssm3a drives(with uprated internals good for 800hp apparently). Changing engines to about 850-900hp. We'd like to stick with the 3a drives. The boat is used in very rough seas in the U.K.
No.6s have been suggested as necessary, what do you all think?
Thanks Jonathan
We have ssm3a drives(with uprated internals good for 800hp apparently). Changing engines to about 850-900hp. We'd like to stick with the 3a drives. The boat is used in very rough seas in the U.K.
No.6s have been suggested as necessary, what do you all think?
Thanks Jonathan
#2
Registered
iTrader: (5)
3A are good drives, so are all speedmasters IV, V, and VI. If your going to make a change the #6 is a great choice and will handle the power better, but they are heavier, expensive, and quite a bit of work to convert. It would be less expensive to buy a spare set of 3A drives and freshen both sets a couple times before redoing your transom and rigging to install a pair of sixes.
#3
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: southampton uk
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many thanks for the reply.
Forgive the lack of knowledge but I had assumed they all used the same transom parts and so an easy job. So, in fact they are completely different and the whole transom will need re-doing, shape of hole etc etc. Is the no6 the big daddy with nothing above apart from Arnesons?
Forgive the lack of knowledge but I had assumed they all used the same transom parts and so an easy job. So, in fact they are completely different and the whole transom will need re-doing, shape of hole etc etc. Is the no6 the big daddy with nothing above apart from Arnesons?
#4
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (6)
You also have the M8, similar to the #6 but Mercury's newest big power drive
#5
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
Many thanks for the reply.
Forgive the lack of knowledge but I had assumed they all used the same transom parts and so an easy job. So, in fact they are completely different and the whole transom will need re-doing, shape of hole etc etc. Is the no6 the big daddy with nothing above apart from Arnesons?
Forgive the lack of knowledge but I had assumed they all used the same transom parts and so an easy job. So, in fact they are completely different and the whole transom will need re-doing, shape of hole etc etc. Is the no6 the big daddy with nothing above apart from Arnesons?
#6
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: southampton uk
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many thanks Griff, great thread. Lot of work in that conversion!! I think for now we'll stick with the 3as and see how we get on, the main reason being cost(anyone got cheap no6s?)
All the best
All the best
Last edited by jonathan49; 11-11-2016 at 05:08 AM.
#9
Registered
iTrader: (1)
^^^ agree.
Not only safe guards the drives but transmissions too.
Mine are set up to slip anything above 900ft/tq
http://www.marinedesigncorp.com/2014.html
Not only safe guards the drives but transmissions too.
Mine are set up to slip anything above 900ft/tq
http://www.marinedesigncorp.com/2014.html
#10
Registered
iTrader: (3)
^^^ agree.
Not only safe guards the drives but transmissions too.
Mine are set up to slip anything above 900ft/tq
http://www.marinedesigncorp.com/2014.html
Not only safe guards the drives but transmissions too.
Mine are set up to slip anything above 900ft/tq
http://www.marinedesigncorp.com/2014.html