Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
Bravo XR Performance Difference >

Bravo XR Performance Difference

Notices

Bravo XR Performance Difference

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-15-2017, 02:28 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Bravo XR Performance Difference

Ok, so long story short, I have an uneven throttle issue I have been trying to debug for a few years. I've pretty much ruled out everything on the engines (complete ground up rebuilds with almost everything that could possibly impact performance replaced). Tried multiple sets of props. The only known difference is in the drives. Both are Bravo uppers and IMCO lowers. Both are 1.5 ratio. The difference is one is a XZ with 32/27 helical gears and ones is an XR with 19/16 straight gears. The straight gears seem to be faster. Anyone have any experience or testing on this? The mathematical difference between the two ratios is about 0.2 MPH. Before I drop almost $2000 on a new set of gears, I want to try and get some insight. Any thoughts?
DarkStorm is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 01:07 AM
  #2  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,558
Received 1,821 Likes on 907 Posts
Default

Swap the drives from side to side to test your theory.
Griff is online now  
Old 04-16-2017, 07:21 AM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
Swap the drives from side to side to test your theory.
Allegedly, it was already tested and found to not be the problem. But at this point, we have not eliminated every possible cause and yet we still have the symptom. The boat is out of the water right now and the drives are open for maintenance so it seems like the perfect opportunity to end this if indeed it is the problem. Swapping the drives again, splash, haul, open one back up again is a fair bit of the way back to the cost of the gears.
DarkStorm is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 07:24 AM
  #4  
Offshoreonly Advertiser
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Mbam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pompano Beach FL, USA
Posts: 2,411
Received 159 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

What is the actual RPM diff at full throttle? Have you verified the tachs? What exactly do you mean by uneven throttle?
Mbam is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 07:26 AM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For reference, since the problem started, both motors were fully torn down. Full rebuild, balance & blueprint on the internals. Heads went out to Hardin for CNC porting (stage 3 upgrade on 525EFI) which also included new camshafts. All new valve train including rockers. Fuel injectors flow tested and rebuilt or replaced. New mechanical fuel pumps, all new filters, every electronic sensor replaced, new coil packs, new wires new plugs. Only thing not changed on this major rebuild / upgrade was the wiring harness and the high pressure fuel pumps.
DarkStorm is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 07:34 AM
  #6  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mbam
What is the actual RPM diff at full throttle? Have you verified the tachs? What exactly do you mean by uneven throttle?
Hmm,it's been 2 years, I did not put it in the water last year because I was focusing on a new business and wedding.

The difference appears to be linear. With the throttles even, the rpm difference starts to show at minimum planing speed and grows larger to wide open. At WOT, if I recall correctly, it was something like 5350-5400 on the port and 5100-5150 on the starboard.

Tachs match the rpms on the laptop scanner. No codes, no noticeable difference on the data logs. The engine noise (harmony) is even when the tachs are even so I don't believe they are the issue. Throttle cables have been replaced since, no change and of course WOT verified at the stops.

Propellers were also changed to a new set.
DarkStorm is offline  
Old 04-17-2017, 02:35 PM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spoke to Merc Racing tech this morning... absolutely a difference in the parasitic loss, the XR is more efficient than the XZ. Anyone have a lightly used set of XR 16:9 gears?
DarkStorm is offline  
Old 04-17-2017, 07:49 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the same setup. No difference in RPM between the drives. A 300 rpm difference would be around 50hp. I don't see that much extra loss in X gears over XR gears.
Wilks is offline  
Old 04-17-2017, 08:04 PM
  #9  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 3,747
Received 866 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

Whoa wait a minute. So you are telling me the XR is more efficient than an X or standard bravo?

I thought the XR was 1+ MPH sometimes 2 MPH slower than an X or bravo drive.
Keith Atlanta is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.