Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Mercruiser engine questions >

Mercruiser engine questions

Notices

Mercruiser engine questions

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-30-2013, 11:43 AM
  #21  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,671
Received 29 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Probably best to grab some serial numbers so you can know for sure.
Captain YARRR is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 12:55 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mcollinstn
Gil manifolds DO help.
They probably are good for 10hp on a 454 Mag, and maybe 12-14hp on a 502Mag.

That puts your 454 Mags at maybe 375 instead of 365, but it technically doesn't change the ENGINE RATING.

Not sure where you're getting the 40hp difference, though unless you're counting the drop from crank rating to prop rating.

It's really irrelevant if you plan to add hop up goodies. Once you change the cam, do some port cleanup on the heads, bore notch the cylinders, and zero deck the block you're going to be well over 400-430hp. You have a good motor to start with.

Just be glad it's not the 330 version, which has weaker bottom end and poor flowing heads.
i have twins so thats why i said 40hp
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 12:57 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Captain YARRR
Probably best to grab some serial numbers so you can know for sure.
I have them, also going to do a double take of the fountain build and inspection sheet I have when I get home.

Like I said do a nada guide run on a 91 fountain fever and it shows 385hp. I guess if the Gill added 10 hp, its possible 10hp might have came from somewhere else.
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 06:00 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Further South East of Dome Island
Posts: 2,014
Received 34 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

350hp prop according to the Mercruiser brochure I have in my hand.

Last edited by Pismo10; 05-01-2013 at 08:39 AM.
Pismo10 is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 08:26 AM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Clearwater, Mn
Posts: 1,226
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

http://www.boatfix.com/merc/Bullet/91/91_16.pdf


Case Closed! This is straight from Mercruiser. Prop HP is 350 on 454 mag/bravo
92nsx is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 08:35 AM
  #26  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ok i looked last night at the performance sheet the day the boat was ran, actually had a time, date, and test drive Actually had Reggies signature there, for those making jokes. It did say 365hp for each engine, so the case is now closed. But I find it funny how Nada, insurance keeps saying their 385s.
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 08:40 AM
  #27  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Further South East of Dome Island
Posts: 2,014
Received 34 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
Ok i looked last night at the performance sheet the day the boat was ran, actually had a time, date, and test drive Actually had Reggies signature there, for those making jokes. It did say 365hp for each engine, so the case is now closed. But I find it funny how Nada, insurance keeps saying their 385s.
It all depends on the year, the 454 mag was 385 later.
Pismo10 is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 07:55 PM
  #28  
Registered
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
Ok i looked last night at the performance sheet the day the boat was ran, actually had a time, date, and test drive Actually had Reggies signature there, for those making jokes. It did say 365hp for each engine, so the case is now closed. But I find it funny how Nada, insurance keeps saying their 385s.
I doubt the data entry geeks for the NADA database are mercury engine experts. I have noticed other errors on the NADA website and unfortunately this is the information that the insurance companies have to work with
dandercam1 is offline  
Old 05-01-2013, 08:07 PM
  #29  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Thousand Islands area
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dandercam1
I doubt the data entry geeks for the NADA database are mercury engine experts. I have noticed other errors on the NADA website and unfortunately this is the information that the insurance companies have to work with
yeah i doubt their pricing as it is. If i check my 91 it says 17k for the thing, and I dont think you could fine a running fountain for under 20
soldier4402 is offline  
Old 05-02-2013, 05:06 PM
  #30  
Registered
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soldier4402
yeah i doubt their pricing as it is. If i check my 91 it says 17k for the thing, and I dont think you could fine a running fountain for under 20
Hahaha agreed. Now this topic sounds like it could be the start of an interesting thread.
dandercam1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.