Single or Dual plane intake manifold?
#14
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo, Ohio/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,029
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Second the above. My 510 c.i. Sterlings pulled 645 H.P. with port-matched Brodix (and some other really good parts!). Also had a friend who changed his Darts to Brodix and gained 200-300 R.P.M. on mildly modified 502's.
Last edited by RedDog382; 10-09-2003 at 07:31 PM.
The following users liked this post:
pouliotk2441 (09-08-2023)
#15
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Annapolis MD
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Monty
Greg and Dyno,
What displacement engine's were involved when you made the intake swaps?
Greg and Dyno,
What displacement engine's were involved when you made the intake swaps?
-Greg
#16
Registered
For a 9:00 to1 502ci, 242/[email protected] dur. .610/.623lft, headers,mildly ported stock heads, 800cfm #9022 Holley. Which would be a better choice for intake, Dart (rectangular or oval port), Brodix, Merlin??
Seems as though I never run under 4500rpm!!
Seems as though I never run under 4500rpm!!
#20
Registered
I am running the Dart now (rect. port version), and the boat seems to run real strong!!
I have plenty of power out of the whole and strong top end!!
I have tried the GM dual plane and lost over 100 rpm on the top end!!
If I am over cammed, I don't think it's by that much lot!!
This is just based on my actual experience with this engine boat combo!
I have plenty of power out of the whole and strong top end!!
I have tried the GM dual plane and lost over 100 rpm on the top end!!
If I am over cammed, I don't think it's by that much lot!!
This is just based on my actual experience with this engine boat combo!