Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Nordic
What's a picture worth? >

What's a picture worth?

Notices

What's a picture worth?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-27-2010, 10:04 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lakeway, TX (Austin/Lake Travis) / LOTO Gravois Arm
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome. Just...awesome. Great learning here. Perhaps one day I'll have the ability to replicate this set-up.
In2Deep is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 08:21 AM
  #12  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Nordicflame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Layton, Utah
Posts: 1,546
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Outstanding Chris!!!

Nice family cruiser

You are finding exactly what we did with the 5 blades. After 93 they are a complete handful. Although our low elevation testing was limited, we did find that the four blades run like they are on rails above that.
Probably a great move with the gear change. Makes complete sense and my guess is you'll love it. Lower pitch prop should also help keep the boat on plane better for towing the kids around beings the Whipple doesn't mind tugging low rpms

Please keep us posted.

Nice work...

Dave
Nordicflame is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 10:48 AM
  #13  
Chris
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
CB-BLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My boat absolutely loves the 1.34 gear... probably because of the very flat torque curve of the Whipple.

You are correct in that it actually planes off quicker using the 28 bravo with the 1.34 gears as opposed to the 32 bravo with a 1.5 gear.

An additional advantage to going to the smaller props, is that my slip numbers went down about 4%.

A P5x is really hard to beat for all around family use... they come out of the hole like they were glued to the water, and midrange cruise is a couple of mph faster than the bravo's. This makes them ideal for pulling water toys or just cruising.

For all out speed and handeling, I like both the bravo's and the Hydromotive Q4X props.. the Q4x's seem to be faster than the Bravo's... but I have not tried a Merc Lab Bravo yet.

Probably because of its 15" diameter, the Q4x slips a little more than a bravo coming out of the hole, but from there on out is 1-2 mph faster per given rpm.

I will be trying a 28 Q4x and a Merc Lab Bravo 28 this next week, and will return and report.

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 03:19 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
cigarette38topgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chesterfield Missouri
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you would shock a bunch of people at the LOTO shootout with the speeds you are reaching! I know you are not close to LOTO but man it would be sweet!

Jt
cigarette38topgun is offline  
Old 06-29-2010, 09:30 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice work Buddy !!!!!!
I DIG IT !! is offline  
Old 07-01-2010, 12:22 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Nashville Tn
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default great numbers chris

now you know why i stick with my 32 bravo. above 94 or 95 the five blades are a handfull.
Jerry Sabatino is offline  
Old 07-03-2010, 07:19 PM
  #17  
Chris
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
CB-BLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jerry Sabatino
now you know why i stick with my 32 bravo. above 94 or 95 the five blades are a handfull.
Yup...
but I can also tell you that my boat is faster with 1.34 gears and a 28 bravo than it is with 1.5 gears and a 32 bravo.

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Old 07-03-2010, 08:34 PM
  #18  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Long Island New York
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's because your spinning the prop shaft faster. But you loose a bit of punch. You have enough HP that it is probably not that noticable. It is probably easier on the outdrive also.
Less torque.

1.34 or 1.36 I keep forgetting.
I regeared also.
raytart is offline  
Old 07-04-2010, 12:18 AM
  #19  
Chris
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
CB-BLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by raytart
1.34 or 1.36 I keep forgetting.
I regeared also.
The upper gear ratio in an SCX is slightly different than in a SC or Bravo upper. Using a SC lower with a Bravo upper nets a 1.36 overall ratio, wherin with my SCX upper, the overall ratio is 1.34 using the same SC lower.

Probably because of the nearly 900 ft/lbs of torque, I did not notice any difference in acceleration.

Chris

Last edited by CB-BLR; 07-04-2010 at 12:22 AM.
CB-BLR is offline  
Old 07-05-2010, 05:05 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern (wish southern) Utah
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It seems, for me at least, that the lower pitch props also lower slip. I tried the 28 lab @ 5750 ft. elevation hit 81 @ 5700 rpm. These are about -2 speeds my 32 lab gets @ 5100 rpm at 4400 ft. elevation. Of course the 28 bounces on the rev limiter @ lower elevation & gains me no speed (in fact I loose 1-2). 15-16 slip for the 28, 17 for the 32. The 28 was stable as could be, could take wide turns @ WOT in 1-2' chop, something that the 32 makes a handful driving straight. It's all about trades, hole shots, cruising & handling.
I wish I could afford what Chris is doing with drives & things, seems you figured this all out.
90mphRAGE is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.