Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Nordic
What's a picture worth? >

What's a picture worth?

Notices

What's a picture worth?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-27-2010 | 10:04 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: Lakeway, TX (Austin/Lake Travis) / LOTO Gravois Arm
Default

Awesome. Just...awesome. Great learning here. Perhaps one day I'll have the ability to replicate this set-up.
In2Deep is offline  
Reply
Old 06-28-2010 | 08:21 AM
  #12  
Nordicflame's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 4
From: Layton, Utah
Default

Outstanding Chris!!!

Nice family cruiser

You are finding exactly what we did with the 5 blades. After 93 they are a complete handful. Although our low elevation testing was limited, we did find that the four blades run like they are on rails above that.
Probably a great move with the gear change. Makes complete sense and my guess is you'll love it. Lower pitch prop should also help keep the boat on plane better for towing the kids around beings the Whipple doesn't mind tugging low rpms

Please keep us posted.

Nice work...

Dave
Nordicflame is offline  
Reply
Old 06-28-2010 | 10:48 AM
  #13  
CB-BLR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chris
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1
From: Snohomish, WA
Default

My boat absolutely loves the 1.34 gear... probably because of the very flat torque curve of the Whipple.

You are correct in that it actually planes off quicker using the 28 bravo with the 1.34 gears as opposed to the 32 bravo with a 1.5 gear.

An additional advantage to going to the smaller props, is that my slip numbers went down about 4%.

A P5x is really hard to beat for all around family use... they come out of the hole like they were glued to the water, and midrange cruise is a couple of mph faster than the bravo's. This makes them ideal for pulling water toys or just cruising.

For all out speed and handeling, I like both the bravo's and the Hydromotive Q4X props.. the Q4x's seem to be faster than the Bravo's... but I have not tried a Merc Lab Bravo yet.

Probably because of its 15" diameter, the Q4x slips a little more than a bravo coming out of the hole, but from there on out is 1-2 mph faster per given rpm.

I will be trying a 28 Q4x and a Merc Lab Bravo 28 this next week, and will return and report.

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Reply
Old 06-28-2010 | 03:19 PM
  #14  
cigarette38topgun's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Default

I think you would shock a bunch of people at the LOTO shootout with the speeds you are reaching! I know you are not close to LOTO but man it would be sweet!

Jt
cigarette38topgun is offline  
Reply
Old 06-29-2010 | 09:30 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Spokane WA
Default

Nice work Buddy !!!!!!
I DIG IT !! is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-2010 | 12:22 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Nashville Tn
Default great numbers chris

now you know why i stick with my 32 bravo. above 94 or 95 the five blades are a handfull.
Jerry Sabatino is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-2010 | 07:19 PM
  #17  
CB-BLR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chris
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1
From: Snohomish, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Jerry Sabatino
now you know why i stick with my 32 bravo. above 94 or 95 the five blades are a handfull.
Yup...
but I can also tell you that my boat is faster with 1.34 gears and a 28 bravo than it is with 1.5 gears and a 32 bravo.

Chris
CB-BLR is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-2010 | 08:34 PM
  #18  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
From: Long Island New York
Default

That's because your spinning the prop shaft faster. But you loose a bit of punch. You have enough HP that it is probably not that noticable. It is probably easier on the outdrive also.
Less torque.

1.34 or 1.36 I keep forgetting.
I regeared also.
raytart is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-2010 | 12:18 AM
  #19  
CB-BLR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Chris
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 1
From: Snohomish, WA
Default

Originally Posted by raytart
1.34 or 1.36 I keep forgetting.
I regeared also.
The upper gear ratio in an SCX is slightly different than in a SC or Bravo upper. Using a SC lower with a Bravo upper nets a 1.36 overall ratio, wherin with my SCX upper, the overall ratio is 1.34 using the same SC lower.

Probably because of the nearly 900 ft/lbs of torque, I did not notice any difference in acceleration.

Chris

Last edited by CB-BLR; 07-04-2010 at 12:22 AM.
CB-BLR is offline  
Reply
Old 07-05-2010 | 05:05 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Northern (wish southern) Utah
Default

It seems, for me at least, that the lower pitch props also lower slip. I tried the 28 lab @ 5750 ft. elevation hit 81 @ 5700 rpm. These are about -2 speeds my 32 lab gets @ 5100 rpm at 4400 ft. elevation. Of course the 28 bounces on the rev limiter @ lower elevation & gains me no speed (in fact I loose 1-2). 15-16 slip for the 28, 17 for the 32. The 28 was stable as could be, could take wide turns @ WOT in 1-2' chop, something that the 32 makes a handful driving straight. It's all about trades, hole shots, cruising & handling.
I wish I could afford what Chris is doing with drives & things, seems you figured this all out.
90mphRAGE is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.