Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Active Thunder
Something totally different >

Something totally different

Notices

Something totally different

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-26-2009 | 02:22 PM
  #51  
ActiveThunder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 10
From: Pompano Beach, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Rik
He says the same thing about rough water. Its good but smooth water the hook is a problem.

See if you can gain 15 mph by removing the hook.
A hook, drives tucked in, the tabs all the way down and 4 fat chicks (I'm talking huge) won't scrub 15 mph off the boat.
ActiveThunder is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-2009 | 04:07 PM
  #52  
Rik's Avatar
Rik
arneson-industries.com
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by ActiveThunder
A hook, drives tucked in, the tabs all the way down and 4 fat chicks (I'm talking huge) won't scrub 15 mph off the boat.
Well there was, past tense, a 1/4" hook in the last 18" of the boats bottom. AT told him it was nothing to be concerened with. I convinced him to remove it and the rest is history.

Yes 15 mph differnece. Can't argue with facts.
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-2009 | 07:35 PM
  #53  
ActiveThunder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 10
From: Pompano Beach, Florida
Default

Well, if that was the only adjustment made I am amazed. If the engine and prop remained exactly the same then I retract the fat chicks remark.

Perhaps the surface drive changes charecteristics. I know on the Pulse Drive the 22 had a small hook but it was the DDC bottom and it scrubbed a little less than 5.
ActiveThunder is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-2009 | 08:42 PM
  #54  
chuckbeecher
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1
From: Anywhere from the Laguna Madre to JAX and beyond
Default

I know someone who had a 32 baja about 15 yrs. ago and they took the hook out and it sped up but what a sh*tty ride ...the faster you went the more it porpoised and needed more and more tab to keep the bow somewhere near level..so there went your speed gain..so it's best not to f*ck with the designers design..but you can feel free to argue the factories x demensions sometimes
chuckbeecher is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-2009 | 08:56 PM
  #55  
ActiveThunder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 10
From: Pompano Beach, Florida
Default

Yeah but the newer 28 is the old 32 hull so it doesn't need the hook to ride.

But I have to say the older 28 hull with twins got my attention a few times!
ActiveThunder is offline  
Reply
Old 04-26-2009 | 09:48 PM
  #56  
Rik's Avatar
Rik
arneson-industries.com
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 7
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by ActiveThunder
Well, if that was the only adjustment made I am amazed. If the engine and prop remained exactly the same then I retract the fat chicks remark.

Perhaps the surface drive changes charecteristics. I know on the Pulse Drive the 22 had a small hook but it was the DDC bottom and it scrubbed a little less than 5.
Yea, two guys, one guy empty on fuel went 69 no matter what propeller he tried. Jess put every cleaver combination, rake, diameter, pitch, # of blades. Then I made a new thrust tube to put a Bravo 1 propeller and a Maximus and the boat was stuck at 69. Utter failure.

Then I asked about the bottom, he was very reluctant to touch it as he has never done anything to fiberglass before. All he did was take a grinder and take the hook out and the last 18" of the boat it put a smile on his face "Full of Fuel" with two people!!

Now the 22' you refer to. If its the same one a father and son run I think out of the Mid West, then that boat does not like the Shoel drive according to them. Had the 28' been made with a step or Rocker, then things would have been a lot faster a lot sooner as far as a Surface Drive application is concerned.
__________________
Arneson Surface Drives www.arneson-industries.com
Rik is offline  
Reply
Old 06-30-2009 | 02:11 PM
  #57  
tblrklakemo's Avatar
SeaRay Sundancer
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
From: SW Missouri
Default

Looks like it runs well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghB2R...eature=channel
tblrklakemo is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-2009 | 12:28 PM
  #58  
outriggers's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Clinton N.J.
Default

Rik said the target was 90 mph, did he make it? Doug
outriggers is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-2009 | 03:13 PM
  #59  
Gladhe8er's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 3
From: Fairfield, CT
Default

Have you made it in the water yet Doug?
Gladhe8er is offline  
Reply
Old 07-01-2009 | 10:17 PM
  #60  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,345
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

1/4 of hook alone was worth 15 mph!
audacity is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.