Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Active Thunder
AT 28 w/ Raylar twin 550's >

AT 28 w/ Raylar twin 550's

Notices

AT 28 w/ Raylar twin 550's

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-17-2008 | 06:47 PM
  #31  
cosmic12's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,951
Likes: 3
From: Syracuse N.Y.
Default

Originally Posted by slboatdrinks
After running mine with 525's for the 3rd season, I can honestly say that if I had put 496's in it, I would have made a BIG mistake.

The boat is the perfect package with 525's.
I agree with you no argument from me. My point is all round more affordable on every point without giveing up much. And way smarter than a 28 with some big overpriced power.
cosmic12 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-17-2008 | 07:03 PM
  #32  
ActiveThunder's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,528
Likes: 10
From: Pompano Beach, Florida
Default

A 33 with twin 496s wll run well over 80 and cost the same as 28 with a single 700 NXT or twin Raylars based on my data.

Fuel effiecent and very resellable......

But who knows? It's really about what you want.
ActiveThunder is offline  
Reply
Old 07-17-2008 | 07:43 PM
  #33  
cosmic12's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,951
Likes: 3
From: Syracuse N.Y.
Default

Someone should ck into what it would cost to insure a 28 w/700nxt I know what it was for a 525. I would be willing to bet it would be a lot more than my dream 33. And though I love the 28s I would prefer the room of the 33 if they are priced about the same now.
cosmic12 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2008 | 09:25 AM
  #34  
rlj676's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
From: Royal Oak, MI
Default

Originally Posted by ActiveThunder
A 33 with twin 496s wll run well over 80 and cost the same as 28 with a single 700 NXT or twin Raylars based on my data.

Fuel effiecent and very resellable......

But who knows? It's really about what you want.
What about a 28 with a single Raylar?

How would that compare speed and cost wise to a single 525?

Seems the weight savings plus 25 hp would be ideal, unless there is a torque issue?
rlj676 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2008 | 09:27 AM
  #35  
R Addiction's Avatar
AT Cult Member #3
25 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,711
Likes: 17
From: Pa.
Default

Ok I'm gonna go there.....

Last edited by R Addiction; 07-18-2008 at 09:32 AM.
R Addiction is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2008 | 09:31 AM
  #36  
R Addiction's Avatar
AT Cult Member #3
25 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,711
Likes: 17
From: Pa.
Default

Originally Posted by TexomaPowerboater


Biggest problem I see with trying to put that much horsepower in a 28 anything is the ride at speed. They weren't designed to go that fast and nobody really knows how they will ride at that speed so its a pretty big gamble. If you want to go 80+ safely I'd definitely want to be in a bigger boat.
Originally Posted by cosmic12
OH my god I actually agree with something from him.
PUZZYS!!!! You don't even feel it when you hit the water...its 4 days later that it hurts!
R Addiction is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2008 | 09:35 AM
  #37  
R Addiction's Avatar
AT Cult Member #3
25 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,711
Likes: 17
From: Pa.
Default

I'm looking into a 530HP 502 for my Tantrum.......to keep it safe you have to know your limitations, thats all
R Addiction is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2008 | 09:46 AM
  #38  
Stormrider's Avatar
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Here's a good question... pricing wise between a 28 and 33.
A hull rigged w/ no power or drives, but ready for them.
For a cabin, either one should be at most a cover girl cabin.
Just 2 simple benches on each side... about 48".
The rest is just storage, or open for Large rubbermaid containers w/ bungees.
The only difference is fiberglass and resin, and extra gauges for 33twin vs 28single. Ya know what... make it a 3way w/ a 28twin also.

Am i missing anything? Would there be any other differences between the boats that would make a price difference?

Last edited by Stormrider; 07-18-2008 at 09:49 AM.
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2008 | 10:27 AM
  #39  
tblrklakemo's Avatar
SeaRay Sundancer
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
From: SW Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by R Addiction
I'm looking into a 530HP 502 for my Tantrum.......to keep it safe you have to know your limitations, thats all
cool....sounds incredibly bad azz.

how much you figure a s-charged 500 or 525 28 w/ a drive built to handle that power reliably will set you back? I bet you could just start with a merc 700nxt and get all that w/ less headache...and a warrenty to boot.

Last edited by tblrklakemo; 07-18-2008 at 10:31 AM.
tblrklakemo is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2008 | 04:46 PM
  #40  
camptappakeg69's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 1
From: Henderson, NY
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Stormrider
Here's a good question... pricing wise between a 28 and 33.
A hull rigged w/ no power or drives, but ready for them.
For a cabin, either one should be at most a cover girl cabin.
Just 2 simple benches on each side... about 48".
The rest is just storage, or open for Large rubbermaid containers w/ bungees.
The only difference is fiberglass and resin, and extra gauges for 33twin vs 28single. Ya know what... make it a 3way w/ a 28twin also.

Am i missing anything? Would there be any other differences between the boats that would make a price difference?
A threeway with twins would be great!!!















Oh wait you mean a boat..............
camptappakeg69 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.