Who needs a AT when...
#6
I've seen that boat many times. It's white and blue, and was in the Miami Boat Show. It has also been on eBay.
At the ECPR 2007, I attempted to help a kid who had just bought a new 28 Challenger. He had bunch of electrical issues. The entire cabin and under structure was built out of plywood spray painted black.
At the ECPR 2007, I attempted to help a kid who had just bought a new 28 Challenger. He had bunch of electrical issues. The entire cabin and under structure was built out of plywood spray painted black.
#9
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pat, How can they use the DDC claim ? Based on what I have read on this forum, your DDC 33 was based on your 37. Do you have any idea where their 33 came from ?
The DDC hull is awesome and I think you have done an excellent job of moving it to the forefront of performance boating. Just curious how this company can do this.
Having had a few Miller Lights with you, I know you either have all the facts or an opinion.
The DDC hull is awesome and I think you have done an excellent job of moving it to the forefront of performance boating. Just curious how this company can do this.
Having had a few Miller Lights with you, I know you either have all the facts or an opinion.
#10
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Syracuse N.Y.
Posts: 4,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't believe Pat or anybody else hasn't answered you guys so I will try. The DDC hull isn't Pats it was done and owened by Harry Schoule (sorry spelling not correct on his last name) he did the design and holds the patent. A.T. and Challanger have to pay for the rights to use it. But that doesn't meen they are the same boats, the A.T. is built to much higher standards and the performance #s speak for themselves. I hope I answered your questions. Pat I hope I didn't butcher it.