Is there a Thread missing ?
#1
Thread Starter
Platinum Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 18
From: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
Thought there was one here !
Thought there was one here as I posted on it a couple times, Anyway Please Post some
Speeds as you complete your testing as I am Very curious about the Top Speed of the Boat! Safe Boating Jeff
Thought there was one here as I posted on it a couple times, Anyway Please Post some
Speeds as you complete your testing as I am Very curious about the Top Speed of the Boat! Safe Boating Jeff
#5
Cat6 and Steve1,
I know I we have had some disagreements and have gone around the block with you guys a few times. And perhaps we may in the future, but I'm not out for any malicious intent---just love to talk about boats and try to be somewhat subjective at times and controversial---sometimes that gets me into trouble. I may not always understand where you guys are coming from at times and vise versa.
Obviously you guys don't have to answer this if you don't want to. But as you both know, I have a 32' AT withOUT a notched transom. I have Stellings extension boxes that have been mounted as high as they could be mounted on the transom---which is JUST A HAIR UNDER the rub-rail. I have the standard length Bravo One XR drives. I was told that my drives with the stock length are too deep in the water and that I would benefit from adding a 2" shorter IMCO lower gear case on my drives. I am running with 1.50 gears and engines make about 685hp each. I just moved my engines 10 inches to the rear to a stock Bravo factory installation. Your input and experteese (spelling?)would be greatly appreciated.
As I have said, you can choose not to answer. It is your choice. Thanks in advance anyway.
Mark/KAAMA
I know I we have had some disagreements and have gone around the block with you guys a few times. And perhaps we may in the future, but I'm not out for any malicious intent---just love to talk about boats and try to be somewhat subjective at times and controversial---sometimes that gets me into trouble. I may not always understand where you guys are coming from at times and vise versa.
Obviously you guys don't have to answer this if you don't want to. But as you both know, I have a 32' AT withOUT a notched transom. I have Stellings extension boxes that have been mounted as high as they could be mounted on the transom---which is JUST A HAIR UNDER the rub-rail. I have the standard length Bravo One XR drives. I was told that my drives with the stock length are too deep in the water and that I would benefit from adding a 2" shorter IMCO lower gear case on my drives. I am running with 1.50 gears and engines make about 685hp each. I just moved my engines 10 inches to the rear to a stock Bravo factory installation. Your input and experteese (spelling?)would be greatly appreciated.
As I have said, you can choose not to answer. It is your choice. Thanks in advance anyway.
Mark/KAAMA
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Take the popcorn with a smile...i am just messing aroud with Jassman, my statements are because his boat is ONLY running around 92 MPH with a true KEITH EICKERT 675 HP setup (the average boat runs upper 90's and the Cig runs 102 with the SAME power), He knows what needs to be done, but he is listneing to people who are not real "EXPERIENCED" and have convinced him to make an offshore boat into a drag boat....with hi power set ups, we will help him out and give him REAL direction for TOP speed, unless he has been brainwashed to think he needs "holshot" performance...which in that case, he should have bought a Drag Boat!

But then again, whatever!

But then again, whatever!
#10
Cat 6 you can egg me on all you want, and the tone of your private email last night was uncalled for, I feel sorry for you, emails as well as aronius statements are what got you into trouble last time, its unfortunate that a person with your background and knowledge, that still might have some potential in the boating field, likes to sit behind a frickin computer and waste his time is beyond me. The thread was deleted because of both yours as well as Steve 1's sarcastic posts. No one has to on your demands, and sarcastic ridicule to A.T as well as Total 1 explain anything to you, Niether of you have been on Dan's boat too see the 102, nor knew how long it took to get up on plane, the x could be raised more, but at what cost, Not Getting Up on Plane, just so a top speed can be posted to sufice you. Yes, I wish it would do 110 and get up on plane quickly, but thats not going to happen, as well as work in this application over here in MS. The 600sc A.T that did 95 also weighed around 8700 and was a simple boat, ours is almost 1000 heavier and 150 hp more. Cat 6, mis spoke again, we managed 92 at only 4900rpms and that was with the 1" spacer in, it got up on plane much quicker, and still has 500 rpms to go. Have a good day gentlemen, I've got to get to work.
Last edited by JASSMAN; 09-17-2002 at 05:58 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DEFYN GRAVITY
General Boating Discussion
4
09-20-2002 06:12 PM






