Ok, so what gives? 42' Comanche
#1
http://www.offshoreonly.com/esvon/page-5707.html
I've had this boat on my desktop for awhile now. It's unique, and in the pics, looks cherry.
That price, is just incredible. No power, yes, but I mean why so cheap? It almost makes me think my 20 year old ass can afford it?
I just don't understand it. It's got some pretty cool little touches as well.
So what do the experts say? How much to get that thing going mint! Is a staggered setup possible? How much do you think she weighs with a half cabin?
Rob
I've had this boat on my desktop for awhile now. It's unique, and in the pics, looks cherry.
That price, is just incredible. No power, yes, but I mean why so cheap? It almost makes me think my 20 year old ass can afford it?
I just don't understand it. It's got some pretty cool little touches as well.
So what do the experts say? How much to get that thing going mint! Is a staggered setup possible? How much do you think she weighs with a half cabin?
Rob
#2
OK, so I searched a little more, and found a few more facts.
- It mas made at the original Apache building
-It was a charter boat in Florida, possibly in Europe as well.
Which kind of sucks, it's probably had the hell beaten out of it.
-A staggered setup doesn't look possible. It's got a funky hatch design so it seems.
Even if it is a beaten charter boat, it doesn't look it. Kind of disapointing, but still.... Why so damn cheap?
- It mas made at the original Apache building
-It was a charter boat in Florida, possibly in Europe as well.
Which kind of sucks, it's probably had the hell beaten out of it.
-A staggered setup doesn't look possible. It's got a funky hatch design so it seems.
Even if it is a beaten charter boat, it doesn't look it. Kind of disapointing, but still.... Why so damn cheap?
#5
Fred Kiekhaefer had an awsome one that had twins that where staggered, loved that boat. It was at a poker run up here when it ws brand new, back in the early 90's, I think.
#7
Registered

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 10
[QUOTE=Why so damn cheap?[/QUOTE]
triple engines cost a lot to maintain and the fact that is says comanche turn your apache guys off.......same bottom,different top deck,( cleaner in my opinion thats why i liked mine, plus triples in a 42)
triple engines cost a lot to maintain and the fact that is says comanche turn your apache guys off.......same bottom,different top deck,( cleaner in my opinion thats why i liked mine, plus triples in a 42)
#8
Yeah I guess I know what you're saying now. I like the older Apaches much better. Not for any particular reason.
Still though, $75K seems dirt cheap for that boat.
I found a picture that showed "Paradigm" on the back of the boat.
So I google searched it and finally found this.
http://www.incredible-adventures.com...e_details.html
20,000lb. boat loaded
140 gallons of fuel burned hourly at 4k.
And a replacement cost of $700,000 big ones. That's quite the depreciation.
Rob
Still though, $75K seems dirt cheap for that boat.
I found a picture that showed "Paradigm" on the back of the boat.
So I google searched it and finally found this.
http://www.incredible-adventures.com...e_details.html
20,000lb. boat loaded
140 gallons of fuel burned hourly at 4k.And a replacement cost of $700,000 big ones. That's quite the depreciation.
Rob
Last edited by Bad Ass TA WS6; 11-09-2005 at 12:41 PM.
#10
For what it's worth, I really like the Comanchees. There is no way I'll afford a triple engine boat, but a 36 that's a different story...
Out of curiosity, how many and what size Comanchees were built?
Bryan
Out of curiosity, how many and what size Comanchees were built?
Bryan


