Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Apache
Anyone know of any 41's for sale?? >

Anyone know of any 41's for sale??

Notices

Anyone know of any 41's for sale??

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-26-2011 | 06:55 PM
  #61  
Comanche3Six's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,214
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Nauti Kitty
Sadly I understand what they cost hence I no longer own one.

NK
Say money is no object.....Do you choose 2 or 3 engines & why?
Pluses & minuses for each application..
What do you think?
3Six
Comanche3Six is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 12:53 PM
  #62  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Comanche3Six
Say money is no object.....Do you choose 2 or 3 engines & why?
Pluses & minuses for each application..
What do you think?
3Six
.................................................. ......I can tell you that if you boat in big water say over 6 footers all the time the 3 engines just have that extra push , you can feel the benefit over the 2 motors,, especially over 6 footers , say like 8 to 10 , you really want the triple package . but for me 2 engines is just fine no matter the conditions .i am just a poor man on a budget .
CHEESE is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 04:21 PM
  #63  
Comanche3Six's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,214
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by CHEESE
.................................................. ......I can tell you that if you boat in big water say over 6 footers all the time the 3 engines just have that extra push , you can feel the benefit over the 2 motors,, especially over 6 footers , say like 8 to 10 , you really want the triple package . but for me 2 engines is just fine no matter the conditions .i am just a poor man on a budget .
I believe the 3 engine configuration will add overall durability to the drivetrains by the 3rd unit soaking up some of the re-entry load, getting on plane load & just plain running hard use. Plus, as mentioned, the extra push when needed. All this & more.....for a price of course!

Last edited by Comanche3Six; 10-29-2011 at 04:29 PM.
Comanche3Six is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 05:06 PM
  #64  
Nauti Kitty's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: Western Michigan
Default

I have played this scenerio over in my mind alot to idle away time while grinding on my boats
Unlimited money I would go with three 1350 mercs
Balance I think 2 staggered 1350's would be a tiny bit better but the throttle repsonse would be a bunch more on the triple and than can help in the heavy water. Plus loosing an engine makes it much safer to have two left. John ran Kemosabe home on one a couple years ago at Boyne thunder. It was throwing this really wierd rooster.

I just hate three throttles in my hand but I would get used to it if I had to.
It would be so interesting to see a triple 1350 top speed
Not sure what the theoretical speed would be but with a straightened bottom and a couple of thousand pound diet it would be something to behold

Not on my budget

NK
Nauti Kitty is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 05:07 PM
  #65  
Nauti Kitty's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: Western Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Comanche3Six
I believe the 3 engine configuration will add overall durability to the drivetrains by the 3rd unit soaking up some of the re-entry load, getting on plane load & just plain running hard use. Plus, as mentioned, the extra push when needed. All this & more.....for a price of course!
Plus it would increase the cruise speed saving the motors some work. all good points here and even though money would be no object down time is

NK
Nauti Kitty is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 06:28 PM
  #66  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Comanche3Six
Say money is no object.....Do you choose 2 or 3 engines & why?
Pluses & minuses for each application..
What do you think?
3Six
If money were no object I'd buy myself a 42' Chief or the 42' Pantera.. maybe even a Nortech all with 700's or 850's... Newer technology, ligher lay-up and more speed, greater reliability with less power but still great handling and rough water capabilities.

At the end of the day, having a fast boat that's reliable and handles big water with comfort is what's important to me.

Ed, you get that Commanche running yet? By the way, we're no longer neighbors, I moved out of state.
Panther is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 06:29 PM
  #67  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Nauti Kitty
Plus it would increase the cruise speed saving the motors some work. all good points here and even though money would be no object down time is

NK
Key word, downtime...
Panther is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 06:36 PM
  #68  
Comanche3Six's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,214
Likes: 5
Default

On the 2 engine side........ease of working on a staggered configuration.......

Last edited by Comanche3Six; 10-29-2011 at 06:49 PM.
Comanche3Six is offline  
Reply
Old 10-30-2011 | 12:49 PM
  #69  
sean stinson's Avatar
The Illustrious One
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,171
Likes: 4
From: Internationally Famous
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
If money were no object I'd buy myself a 42' Chief or the 42' Pantera.. maybe even a Nortech all with 700's or 850's... Newer technology, ligher lay-up and more speed, greater reliability with less power but still great handling and rough water capabilities.

At the end of the day, having a fast boat that's reliable and handles big water with comfort is what's important to me.

Ed, you get that Commanche running yet? By the way, we're no longer neighbors, I moved out of state.
Pantera is the choice there Frankie
__________________
Dying,....Is the day worth living for!!!!!!
sean stinson is offline  
Reply
Old 10-30-2011 | 06:49 PM
  #70  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 14
From: Here and There
Default

Originally Posted by sean stinson
Pantera is the choice there Frankie
+1 If i had the funds for a brand new boat the pantera would be my first choice. The race footage of the one that went to europe is just awesome. Plus, it would still fit in my boat slip LOL..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ke16Nr95NM
baywatch is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.