allez vite
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by jdwlac
hey wampum, what hull are u running that big power in?
apachepete - as always thanks, and by the way
you write very interesting posts -
joe
hey wampum, what hull are u running that big power in?
apachepete - as always thanks, and by the way
you write very interesting posts -
joe
#38
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo, Ohio/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,029
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Apache Pete,
Awesome boat, great story! And now you're in a 382 Formula? Does the wife like it better and what is your take on the 41 Apache vs 382 Formula for pleasure boating in terms of ride quality?
Awesome boat, great story! And now you're in a 382 Formula? Does the wife like it better and what is your take on the 41 Apache vs 382 Formula for pleasure boating in terms of ride quality?
#39
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sarasota,FL & Saugatuck, MI
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes
on
6 Posts
Yes, I'm in a 382 now, but there were some intermediate steps designed to please the Mrs.
First was a 45' Sea-ray. Thought cruising might be fun, but the boat usually was used for cocktail cruises. Pretty much over-kill. And too slow.
So, too big, and too slow: what to do?
So we tried a 28'Sea-ray bow-rider with 350
Magnums. A nice boat, but over time even less spousal participation, as the novelty of cocktail cruising had worn off. I liked to jump waves it in @ 60, but was always afraid I'd get thrown out.
So next was the 382, and a Pursuit center-console for fishing. As it's turned out, the Pursuit is also fine for lunch runs and cocktails, but for going any distance the Formula gets her reluctant nod. Even with Silent Choice it's still considered too loud, but it's marginally OK being kept on a lift at the house.
So my decades long quest for a good boating compromise has met with only limited success. There probably isn't an ideal solution at our house, but this one seems to work well enough to stick with a while.
As for comparison between the Formula and Apache, they're so very different in every way it's hard to know where to start.
The Formula is what I'd call a "Gentleman's Speed Boat," while the Apache is and "Un-gentlemanly Race Boat."
The Apache is much more solid, with zero rattles because there's nothing to rattle: no cabin, stereo, head, doors, etc. The Formula has lots of stuff to break and rattle.
The Apache feels much more secure at speed and in the rough, because you're standing in chest high bolsters that squeeze you on 3 sides. I also like the control set-up better on the Apache: the throttles are where they just naturally fall into your right hand, while the trim switches are just in front of the steering wheel, where you can easily hit them without moving your left had more that a couple of inches from the wheel. I find with Formula's set-up it's hard to throttle and trim (especially the tabs) at the same time, and I'm always hitting the drive trim in the throttles by mistake when throttling vigorously.
The Apache was actually boring for cruising in calm conditions: no wind protection, can't sit down, very loud. I got so that I would only go out if it was quite/very rough. It just wasn't worth the expense of racing gas for a calm cruise. And I could easily burn all 320 gallons in a day, at what today would be $6/gal.
On the other hand, the Formula is wonderful in calm conditions, OK in moderate conditions (like the Sarasota Poker Run last weekend), and no fun at all when it's really rough. It may be a successful F-2 boat, but with a full interior I don't think it's really much of wave-jumper. Sure, it'll do it, but it reminds me of my 41 pleasure Apache. As Marc McManus told me, that's not what it's intended for.
First was a 45' Sea-ray. Thought cruising might be fun, but the boat usually was used for cocktail cruises. Pretty much over-kill. And too slow.
So, too big, and too slow: what to do?
So we tried a 28'Sea-ray bow-rider with 350
Magnums. A nice boat, but over time even less spousal participation, as the novelty of cocktail cruising had worn off. I liked to jump waves it in @ 60, but was always afraid I'd get thrown out.
So next was the 382, and a Pursuit center-console for fishing. As it's turned out, the Pursuit is also fine for lunch runs and cocktails, but for going any distance the Formula gets her reluctant nod. Even with Silent Choice it's still considered too loud, but it's marginally OK being kept on a lift at the house.
So my decades long quest for a good boating compromise has met with only limited success. There probably isn't an ideal solution at our house, but this one seems to work well enough to stick with a while.
As for comparison between the Formula and Apache, they're so very different in every way it's hard to know where to start.
The Formula is what I'd call a "Gentleman's Speed Boat," while the Apache is and "Un-gentlemanly Race Boat."
The Apache is much more solid, with zero rattles because there's nothing to rattle: no cabin, stereo, head, doors, etc. The Formula has lots of stuff to break and rattle.
The Apache feels much more secure at speed and in the rough, because you're standing in chest high bolsters that squeeze you on 3 sides. I also like the control set-up better on the Apache: the throttles are where they just naturally fall into your right hand, while the trim switches are just in front of the steering wheel, where you can easily hit them without moving your left had more that a couple of inches from the wheel. I find with Formula's set-up it's hard to throttle and trim (especially the tabs) at the same time, and I'm always hitting the drive trim in the throttles by mistake when throttling vigorously.
The Apache was actually boring for cruising in calm conditions: no wind protection, can't sit down, very loud. I got so that I would only go out if it was quite/very rough. It just wasn't worth the expense of racing gas for a calm cruise. And I could easily burn all 320 gallons in a day, at what today would be $6/gal.
On the other hand, the Formula is wonderful in calm conditions, OK in moderate conditions (like the Sarasota Poker Run last weekend), and no fun at all when it's really rough. It may be a successful F-2 boat, but with a full interior I don't think it's really much of wave-jumper. Sure, it'll do it, but it reminds me of my 41 pleasure Apache. As Marc McManus told me, that's not what it's intended for.
#40
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toledo, Ohio/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,029
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Thanks for your comments. Nothing said that really surprised me. I was fortunate to get a brief ride on a kevlar 41 Apache at a race in Cleveland a few years ago (Insane Warrior). I was really having a great time until interrupted when a F-1 boat was turned into a bow-rider in a really bad stuffing accident.
I briefly considered buying Insane Warrior when it came up for sale last year, but decided to go with the '99 382 Poker Run Special instead for all the reasons you have mentioned above. I didn't really like the fairing on the Poker Run Special due to the lack of wind protection and have replaced it with a stainless windshield.
I am very happy with the 382, but there is still just something about the Apache ...
I briefly considered buying Insane Warrior when it came up for sale last year, but decided to go with the '99 382 Poker Run Special instead for all the reasons you have mentioned above. I didn't really like the fairing on the Poker Run Special due to the lack of wind protection and have replaced it with a stainless windshield.
I am very happy with the 382, but there is still just something about the Apache ...
Last edited by RedDog382; 04-07-2004 at 01:01 AM.