Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Baja
Mpg 29 Outlaw? >

Mpg 29 Outlaw?

Notices

Mpg 29 Outlaw?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-03-2010 | 08:15 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, KY
Default

Originally Posted by Nightlife1970
. Let's face it, I don't know many people that can stay just at cruize. Most start pushing that throttle forward once the speed changes you....
Dave you know me and i just cruise... at 5200RPM's
Anchorman is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 09:23 PM
  #22  
Nightlife1970's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, Mi
Default

Originally Posted by Anchorman
Dave you know me and i just cruise... at 5200RPM's
Cruise...? Don't you mean take flight
Nightlife1970 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-03-2010 | 10:46 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Lorain, ohio
Default

"That makes me think a 496 HO would be the best choise. Maby with a mildly set charger."

I have never seen a mildly set charger, that's a year old.
"Speed changes you"

Get the twins. i have the single.
hungupthespikes is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 08:03 AM
  #24  
bajarick's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 622
Likes: 2
From: canfield, Ohio/cape coral FL
Default

Who and the hell would worry about how much
fuel you would use when it comes to boating, if
fuel is a problem do not buy a boat .
Twins are the way to go, if you have 496 s do not
build them, they ll last for ever just service them well.
I have 740 hrs and no problems.
bajarick is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 10:50 AM
  #25  
Teo
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nightlife1970
In my personal experience, I burned far more gas in a single than I do with my twin. I was always pushing the single engine harder to acheive speed. Where as I get that speed at lower RPM's with the twins.

It is possible if you were to strickly run at cruize, that the single may be better on fuel. The thing is you will burn much more at take off and at higher speeds because you are working that engine harder. Let's face it, I don't know many people that can stay just at cruize. Most start pushing that throttle forward once the speed changes you....
I know the mpg will vanish as soon as I start playing around and thats fine with me. The thing is that there is an island I probably will go to lots of times and it is about 170 miles away from shore and that is the only thing thats makes me think about the mpg at cruise.
Or that and the fact that the singel engine 29 is about 5.600 lbs and the dubble 6.800 lbs.
Teo is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 11:42 AM
  #26  
Nightlife1970's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, Mi
Default

Originally Posted by Teo
I know the mpg will vanish as soon as I start playing around and thats fine with me. The thing is that there is an island I probably will go to lots of times and it is about 170 miles away from shore and that is the only thing thats makes me think about the mpg at cruise.
Or that and the fact that the singel engine 29 is about 5.600 lbs and the dubble 6.800 lbs.
Thats why I say, that I don't think the single would be better on fuel. Look with those numbers a single is pushing 5600 lbs the dual is pushing 3400 lbs per engine. Common sense would say the twins are going to be better on fuel. If anything I think a twin small block would probably be the very best on fuel.

Certainly you are going to burn fuel faster with the twins, but you are going to go faster as well. I know i go farther on the same fuel with my twin engines than I did with my single.
Nightlife1970 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 12:01 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,957
Likes: 1
From: www.bajaboatowners.com
Default

Not only would I think it's better on fuel, but being 170 miles from shore on a single wouldn't make me feel very secure.
Irishtornado is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 12:47 PM
  #28  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 2
From: Northern, KY (Cincinnati) Lake St Clair, MI Norris Lake, TN
Default

170 miles from shore in a 29' anything wouldn't make me secure no matter how it was powered.
Baja_342 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 12:59 PM
  #29  
Teo
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

I´ve done that journey in a smaller boat. The waters are pritty calm over here.
Teo is offline  
Reply
Old 08-04-2010 | 01:19 PM
  #30  
Teo
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Irishtornado
Not only would I think it's better on fuel, but being 170 miles from shore on a single wouldn't make me feel very secure.
You do have a point there..
Teo is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.