Originally Posted by rmbuilder (Post 3557947)

Mike,
A number of your former customers have stated publically their dissatisfaction with not only with your workmanship (or lack thereof), but a void in your ethical conduct. I have not commented to date regarding the claims you have made in your rebuttal. I have refrained in light of the fact that I have a great deal of firsthand, documented data specifically pertaining to Anthony’s engine. As you are aware I was contacted, by Anthony, to supply consultation regarding your involvement in the premature failure of his engines. As a result I believed it appropriate that I remain impartial.
At this juncture enough time has elapsed that I will speak candidly as the time for my clients litigation has passed and you have crossed the line with your unfounded accusations towards some members of this forum.
Simply put, every detail (posted on this thread) regarding the shoddy workmanship, lack of attention to detail, and totally incompetent assembly procedures, is 100% true according to the data presented to me.

Secondly, let’s address the topic of your untruthful remarks regarding Steve Smith. I have had the opportunity to work with Steve on a number of his projects over the last seven years. He is one the brightest, intuitive, mechanically competent individuals I have known. He has consistently, reliably, extracted more power from his components than anyone could reasonably expect. He has contributed as much technically relevant information to the tech section as any single individual in the ten years I have been a member here. He does so without any profit motive whatsoever. That speaks volumes.

Your abysmal record Mike is accurately reflected in this thread.
Regards,

Bob

Originally Posted by rmbuilder (Post 3557947)

Mike,
A number of your former customers have stated publically their dissatisfaction with not only with your workmanship (or lack thereof), but a void in your ethical conduct. I have not commented to date regarding the claims you have made in your rebuttal. I have refrained in light of the fact that I have a great deal of firsthand, documented data specifically pertaining to Anthony’s engine. As you are aware I was contacted, by Anthony, to supply consultation regarding your involvement in the premature failure of his engines. As a result I believed it appropriate that I remain impartial.
At this juncture enough time has elapsed that I will speak candidly as the time for my clients litigation has passed and you have crossed the line with your unfounded accusations towards some members of this forum.
Simply put, every detail (posted on this thread) regarding the shoddy workmanship, lack of attention to detail, and totally incompetent assembly procedures, is 100% true according to the data presented to me.

Secondly, let’s address the topic of your untruthful remarks regarding Steve Smith. I have had the opportunity to work with Steve on a number of his projects over the last seven years. He is one the brightest, intuitive, mechanically competent individuals I have known. He has consistently, reliably, extracted more power from his components than anyone could reasonably expect. He has contributed as much technically relevant information to the tech section as any single individual in the ten years I have been a member here. He does so without any profit motive whatsoever. That speaks volumes.

Your abysmal record Mike is accurately reflected in this thread.
Regards,

Bob

Originally Posted by rmbuilder (Post 3557947)

Mike,
A number of your former customers have stated publically their dissatisfaction with not only with your workmanship (or lack thereof), but a void in your ethical conduct. I have not commented to date regarding the claims you have made in your rebuttal. I have refrained in light of the fact that I have a great deal of firsthand, documented data specifically pertaining to Anthony’s engine. As you are aware I was contacted, by Anthony, to supply consultation regarding your involvement in the premature failure of his engines. As a result I believed it appropriate that I remain impartial.
At this juncture enough time has elapsed that I will speak candidly as the time for my clients litigation has passed and you have crossed the line with your unfounded accusations towards some members of this forum.
Simply put, every detail (posted on this thread) regarding the shoddy workmanship, lack of attention to detail, and totally incompetent assembly procedures, is 100% true according to the data presented to me.

Secondly, let’s address the topic of your untruthful remarks regarding Steve Smith. I have had the opportunity to work with Steve on a number of his projects over the last seven years. He is one the brightest, intuitive, mechanically competent individuals I have known. He has consistently, reliably, extracted more power from his components than anyone could reasonably expect. He has contributed as much technically relevant information to the tech section as any single individual in the ten years I have been a member here. He does so without any profit motive whatsoever. That speaks volumes.

Your abysmal record Mike is accurately reflected in this thread.
Regards,

Bob

Originally Posted by 6500steve54 (Post 3558174)

Aparently light years

Originally Posted by PARADISE ISLAND (Post 3558300)

:eek:Aparently we need Judge Judy on this one that little legal rant was 1 sided:eek:

Originally Posted by PARADISE ISLAND (Post 3558300)

:eek:Aparently we need Judge Judy on this one that little legal rant was 1 sided:eek:

Originally Posted by offshoredrillin (Post 3558579)

Andrew, remember this quote..live it learn it love it....

" It's better to be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt"

Originally Posted by catastrophe (Post 3558598)

WAAAYYY too late for that.