Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Checkmate
Checkmate 281 Maxxum >

Checkmate 281 Maxxum

Notices

Checkmate 281 Maxxum

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-31-2009 | 02:57 PM
  #11  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 97
From: Hudson, IL
Default

Furuvagen,

Welcome, I have a 90 Maxxum 281 also. I think it handles ruff water pretty well. I have had it out on Lake Michigan and the waves have to get over 5 feet before it really starts to "flop" hard at cruize. (40-42 MPH)

Where are you located?
Precision is offline  
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 09:53 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: berea,ky.
Default

i have a 2003 checkmate 300 with the notched transom. the boat is great in rough water and runs 82.
checkeredpast is offline  
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 04:23 PM
  #13  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 267
Likes: 2
From: Williamston / Grand Haven, MI
Default

Originally Posted by checkeredpast
i have a 2003 checkmate 300 with the notched transom. the boat is great in rough water and runs 82.
What do you have for power?
Inspector is offline  
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 06:23 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: berea,ky.
Default

i have a procherged 496 ho in my checkmate. it's not the fastest boat out there but it is turn key.
checkeredpast is offline  
Reply
Old 01-01-2010 | 07:22 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: SOME WHERE IN TIME AND STILL LOST
Default

Furuvagen , not to be rude and with your year of boat i would be concerend with the foam under the floors in the cockpit area for the pure fact that a friend of mine here in Mich has done a lot of repairs on Checks because of the foam which absorbs water like a sponge and creates rot to the floors and stringers and i think once you go to the Check site you will know what im talking about .
SUE C Q is offline  
Reply
Old 01-05-2010 | 11:30 AM
  #16  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,755
Likes: 152
From: Connecticut
Default

Had a 1990 281 Maxxum about 4 yrs ago. Had 2 small blocks w/ bravos .Engines were 320HP EFI's from the factory. Ran good , about 65 MPH. All red boat, and red interior! Hot in sun. But alot of fun!!!!Handled rough water pretty well for a 28 ft boat...........
kreed is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2010 | 08:44 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: ct
Default

I have a 1989 281 maxxum with a 7.4 mpi power runs 55 to 60 handles the waves great . Been in long island sound in 4 to 6 footers no problem. The hull is 7/16 thick 5300 lbs dry heavy boat but solid
checkmate128 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-07-2010 | 11:13 AM
  #18  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,755
Likes: 152
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by checkmate128
I have a 1989 281 maxxum with a 7.4 mpi power runs 55 to 60 handles the waves great . Been in long island sound in 4 to 6 footers no problem. The hull is 7/16 thick 5300 lbs dry heavy boat but solid
Yea but you gotta be careful in 6 footers. That hull is a production hull just like Baja!! It will come apart eventually in the rough stuff. Its not a hand built hull. Just ask Howard!
kreed is offline  
Reply
Old 01-08-2010 | 04:18 AM
  #19  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Göteborg
Default

Originally Posted by Precision
Furuvagen,
Where are you located?
Hi,
I live on Ockero, a small island off the west coast of Sweden.

Thanks to everyone for all the recent replies, by the way! It is always interesting to hear what people have to say that have been driving this model themselves!

Kreed: What is the big difference between a production hull and a hand built one? I was really pounding my -89 251 Convincor for quite a few years (high jumps - drive and all out of the water), and it never even gave away the least bit of rattle anywhere in the hull. It seemed totally indestructable (which I'm pretty sure it wasn't but still...)...

It also seems to me like a lot of newer boats (with aims at a high top speed) are a lot lighter (built with thinner hulls).
But then again I am far from an expert in this field. Anyone with more knowledge, please clear the confusion here!
Furuvagen is offline  
Reply
Old 01-22-2010 | 08:39 AM
  #20  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,755
Likes: 152
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by Furuvagen
Hi,
I live on Ockero, a small island off the west coast of Sweden.

Thanks to everyone for all the recent replies, by the way! It is always interesting to hear what people have to say that have been driving this model themselves!

Kreed: What is the big difference between a production hull and a hand built one? I was really pounding my -89 251 Convincor for quite a few years (high jumps - drive and all out of the water), and it never even gave away the least bit of rattle anywhere in the hull. It seemed totally indestructable (which I'm pretty sure it wasn't but still...)...

It also seems to me like a lot of newer boats (with aims at a high top speed) are a lot lighter (built with thinner hulls).
But then again I am far from an expert in this field. Anyone with more knowledge, please clear the confusion here!
Hey, I was just teasing Checkmate128. When we went to buy my Cigarette, the previous owner told us that the Checkmate hulls were not built very well and would never compare to a Cigarette. He told us its only a production hull, not a hand built hull like a Cigarette. Checkmate128 was about to kill this guy! He was actually very rude about it....small brain, big pockets !! Ive owned Checkmates and always had great luck with them! Great boat.....
kreed is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.