Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Cigarette
38 GUN vs 42 TIGER? >

38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Notices

38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-30-2005 | 08:19 AM
  #11  
GLH's Avatar
GLH
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
Likes: 21
From: Burlington, VT
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Originally Posted by OldSchool
I agree!!!!
The local civil servant at work that day!!!!
Attached Thumbnails 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?-old-school.jpg  
GLH is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-2005 | 09:13 AM
  #12  
CIG3's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,292
Likes: 20
From: Grand River, Ohio
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

The best running 42' in my opinion are the none stepped cover girl 1/2 cabin Tigers. 500HP's and bravo will put you in the mid 70's all day. Much better ride in the rough stuff too.

A non step 38 1998-early2000 are lighter than the earlier T/G's and run well with 500HP's mid 70's with a full cabin. Still handle well in the rough stuff.

The T/S boats are a little more unstable due to the steps being so big and forward on the CG. Not as turn and rough water friendly.

Just my $.02
CIG3 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-2005 | 09:21 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,900
Likes: 10
From: Vice City & Tavernier, FL
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Originally Posted by CIG3
The best running 42' in my opinion are the none stepped cover girl 1/2 cabin Tigers. 500HP's and bravo will put you in the mid 70's all day. Much better ride in the rough stuff too.

A non step 38 1998-early2000 are lighter than the earlier T/G's and run well with 500HP's mid 70's with a full cabin. Still handle well in the rough stuff.

The T/S boats are a little more unstable due to the steps being so big and forward on the CG. Not as turn and rough water friendly.

Just my $.02

i second that

jr
thedonz is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-2005 | 11:02 AM
  #14  
offshoredrillin's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,315
Likes: 1,557
From: Maryland
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Originally Posted by GLH
The local civil servant at work that day!!!!
dayum, you and he had quite the pair of manboobs on the tiger that day
offshoredrillin is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-2005 | 11:28 AM
  #15  
Havasu Cig's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Originally Posted by CIG3
The best running 42' in my opinion are the none stepped cover girl 1/2 cabin Tigers. 500HP's and bravo will put you in the mid 70's all day. Much better ride in the rough stuff too.

A non step 38 1998-early2000 are lighter than the earlier T/G's and run well with 500HP's mid 70's with a full cabin. Still handle well in the rough stuff.

The T/S boats are a little more unstable due to the steps being so big and forward on the CG. Not as turn and rough water friendly.

Just my $.02
Have to disagree with the comments on the T/S. My buddy has a Tiger with 1000's and 6's and I had a T/S Gun with 500's. The Tiger is definitely a wave crusher but I felt my Gun was just as capable in the rough. The Gun actually flew a little flater when it got out of the water than the Tiger does. The only wierd feeling I ever got in the gun was boat wake hitting it from the side. I would rock a little from side to side, but never felt unstable.
Havasu Cig is offline  
Reply
Old 09-30-2005 | 04:58 PM
  #16  
GLH's Avatar
GLH
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
Likes: 21
From: Burlington, VT
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Originally Posted by Havasu Cig
Have to disagree with the comments on the T/S. My buddy has a Tiger with 1000's and 6's and I had a T/S Gun with 500's. The Tiger is definitely a wave crusher but I felt my Gun was just as capable in the rough. The Gun actually flew a little flater when it got out of the water than the Tiger does...
Rough water is a great equalizer regarding power, in that stuff any advantages in lenght helps.



GLH is offline  
Reply
Old 10-04-2005 | 12:08 PM
  #17  
CIG3's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,292
Likes: 20
From: Grand River, Ohio
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

The Tiger was designed for 500HP's and Bravos and a half cabin.

The CG really changes with fuls cabins and #6's and blower motors. Not to say that they aren't good boats but theyare outside the scope of the original design. Things may have changed since they T/S was introduced.

I also agree that the T/G is as good a rough water boat as the Tiger, but the extra length does make a differnence.
CIG3 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-04-2005 | 06:29 PM
  #18  
H20W8STER's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 41
Likes: 6
From: DISCOVERY BAY, CA
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Now we're gettin somewhere West Coast Big Water and Bigger Boats Seems to be the ticket 42's with 500's may not get there first, but It sounds like We'll be DRY and in ONE piece Thanks for the all the input
H20W8STER is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2005 | 01:11 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default Re: 38 GUN vs 42 TIGER?

Do you called that rough water try Puerto Rico here we have rough water here top guns navigate I personally have one , but in waves normally 8' to 10' going to st thomas you want to have a 55 foot boat
henrys is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ciaoderhead
Cigarette
73
04-25-2008 08:44 AM
RICKY PEREZ
Cigarette
11
04-18-2005 04:03 AM
BAJA WILL
Cigarette
11
03-04-2005 10:48 PM
2COOL
Cigarette
18
02-05-2004 02:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.