cigarette sign
#71

#72
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
A little of both, a degree in neither. I employ engineers and to keep up and be BS-proof, I've had to learn all I can about the field. It helps to have been born in a machine shop and race car fab co. I had a business partner for about 8 years that was an exceptionally well-accomplished attorney. I learned tons from him, plus (unfortunately) have had the opportunity to spend plenty of $$ on legal representation over the years. When I'm spending my hard earned $$, I like to know exactly what's going on.
#73
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
One other consideration...
There's no such thing as the Intellectual Property Police. All a patent or trademark does is assign ownership rights. If someone infringes on them, it's the holders responsibility to secure them. USPTO has no enforcement department. In essence, the holder would have the entire burden of locating, investigating and litigating any claim. Then they would have to collect on any judgment they might receive. The worst possible scenario anyone could expect is to get a cease & desist from the holder's counsel.
I'm not suggesting that calling Cigarette would be a bad idea. They're good people and probably would have no problem with someone (an owner of their product) courteous enough to inquire before commissioning a piece of artwork- something they don't even offer themselves. But remember, there's scant difference between having one of these lights made and having a logo airbrushed onto the side of your boat.
Lastly, the core issue is individual vs. commercial use. You're not making these for profit.
There's no such thing as the Intellectual Property Police. All a patent or trademark does is assign ownership rights. If someone infringes on them, it's the holders responsibility to secure them. USPTO has no enforcement department. In essence, the holder would have the entire burden of locating, investigating and litigating any claim. Then they would have to collect on any judgment they might receive. The worst possible scenario anyone could expect is to get a cease & desist from the holder's counsel.
I'm not suggesting that calling Cigarette would be a bad idea. They're good people and probably would have no problem with someone (an owner of their product) courteous enough to inquire before commissioning a piece of artwork- something they don't even offer themselves. But remember, there's scant difference between having one of these lights made and having a logo airbrushed onto the side of your boat.
Lastly, the core issue is individual vs. commercial use. You're not making these for profit.
#74
Registered

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,199
Likes: 5
From: FLORIDUH
#75
Registered
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
I spoke to Cigarette today and I am unable to make these signs. Anytime I use there logo and sell them to the public someone is making a profit. Therefore I cant get permission from the company to produce these signs. However they are getting bids from a few different sign shops including myself and will hopefully have these for sale on there website for everyone interested.Although the price may change there's not much I can do about that.Cigarette is a world leading performance boat company that just doesnt want there logo disrespected. Sometimes you'll see older cigarettes that have had the interior redone and it just doesnt look right and at the end of the day it makes cigarette look bad. So in all respect the right thing to do is wait for cigarette to get these made and hopefully i'll win the bid so everyone is satisfied with the product as it will look like the one in dougs bar.



