Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Cigarette
42x  and 42 tiger >

42x and 42 tiger

Notices

42x and 42 tiger

Old 10-06-2010 | 02:31 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default 42x and 42 tiger

What is the difference between the 42 X and the 42 Tiger?

Or is there any?
the bear is offline  
Reply
Old 10-06-2010 | 02:57 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
From: Roswell, Ga
Default

42X staggared 7 42 Tiger side by side. Completely different boats.
twin screws is offline  
Reply
Old 10-06-2010 | 05:21 PM
  #3  
fastoys's Avatar
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Default

Not even close!!
fastoys is offline  
Reply
Old 10-06-2010 | 07:14 PM
  #4  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 612
Likes: 10
From: St. Louis / LOTO
Default

Uh-oh... Whatcha got going, Bear?
Shallow Minded is offline  
Reply
Old 10-07-2010 | 08:08 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default

so if they arent close, then what is the main differences. is the x more sport than the tiger? I didnt see the tiger on 2011 line up so I am guessing the x is more efficient and the newer design

It looks too me both are step hulls but the staggard set up on the x moves the cockpit farther forward and the cabin is smaller, what else is different?

Last edited by the bear; 10-07-2010 at 09:22 AM. Reason: added more....
the bear is offline  
Reply
Old 10-07-2010 | 08:10 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default

Originally Posted by Shallow Minded
Uh-oh... Whatcha got going, Bear?
Just looking for a replacement........ Not real serious yet, I bought momma a bass boat and a new playcraft with a 300 this year so i may have to wait a little bit, but i am just educating myself.
the bear is offline  
Reply
Old 10-07-2010 | 09:25 AM
  #7  
thisistank's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14,571
Likes: 4,541
From: Channel Islands, So. Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by the bear
so if they arent close, then what is the main differences. is the x more sport than the tiger? I didnt see the tiger on 2011 line up so I am guessing the x is more efficient and the newer design
Off the top of my head....

The Tiger was released some time in the mid 90's, it utilized the Revolution hull with a new/updated deck, interior and cabin. The first of the Tigers were obviously straight hulls and most had large power and #6 drives.

In the early 00's when Cig started stepping their boats, they came out with the stepped Tiger. The boat ran great with bravos and smaller power but ran like sh!t with large power and 6's because the CG was not right. Cig quickly fixed this problem by changing the steps around a bit, thus changing the CG. This evolved into the 42X. For a couple year in the mid 00's Cigarette sold both the "Tiger" and teh "42X". If you wanted ITS/Bravo package you got the Tiger, if you wanted the big power and 6's you ordered the 42X.

Eventually though, Cig realized that the 42X was a great hull and performed well with Bravo's/ITS/NXT & VI's. So they scrapped the Tiger and now sell the 42X with whatever lay out you want.

In the pics bellow you can actually see the change in the steps: a little smaller and a little closer. The Blue "Tiger" with Neil driving is the old step desing and the yellow/Green "42X" with Bud driving is the new step design. The other pic is a straight bottom Tiger.

And of course, besides the bottom changes there is continuing upgrade and changing of the interior, dash, cabin (though the basic form of all pretty much stayed the same).
Attached Thumbnails 42x  and 42 tiger-tiger_intro.jpg   42x  and 42 tiger-x_intro.jpg   42x  and 42 tiger-tiger.jpg  

thisistank is offline  
Reply
Old 10-07-2010 | 10:11 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default

Thanks Tank, thats the info I was looking for.
the bear is offline  
Reply
Old 10-08-2010 | 04:39 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: LANCASTER, OHIO
Default

Nice job Tank, it's information like this that keeps me coming back to OSO time and time again.
NEVERSATISFIED is offline  
Reply
Old 08-19-2015 | 12:03 PM
  #10  
JasonSmith's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,333
Likes: 5
From: USA
Default

Old thread, but I'm looking at a 42 Tiger.....so would it be safe to say that a big power Tiger T/S with #6's would be something to not bother looking at?
JasonSmith is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.