|
whats wrong with this?
this boat has always had my eye.
it seems reasonable and clean. is there something wrong with it? http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o25045-en.html |
Originally Posted by STRAIGHTPRIORITY
(Post 3436938)
this boat has always had my eye.
it seems reasonable and clean. is there something wrong with it? http://www.offshoreonly.com/classifi...o25045-en.html Old dash design Back bench seat headrests need cut down. 42X isn't a popular line, once someone moves from a 39 they usually go to a 46 if they are going big power. Tim said the 46 is their most efficient hull, but who knows. |
all valid points.
what did your 46 cruise at? it had 1075's correct? |
Originally Posted by STRAIGHTPRIORITY
(Post 3436952)
all valid points.
what did your 46 cruise at? it had 1075's correct? |
I've seen this boat first hand at the St Clair Riverfest. It's a stunning piece.
|
wow. thats strong
|
Originally Posted by BraceYourself
(Post 3437022)
90 was comfortable
Sorry for the hi-jack |
Originally Posted by kvogt
(Post 3437154)
What RPM was 90
I like that tiger. Did the Tiger have handling issues with a #6 or am I thinking of another hull? |
Originally Posted by Biggus
(Post 3437065)
I've seen this boat first hand at the St Clair Riverfest. It's a stunning piece.
|
Originally Posted by kvogt
(Post 3437154)
What RPM was 90
Sorry for the hi-jack 5200= 100 red line is 6000 |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.