![]() |
mine with 600's tested by powerboat.
Top Speed at RPM 83.3 MPH at 5300 Acceleration in 20 sec. 72.0 MPH Mirrange Acceleration 40-70 MPH in 6.8 Sec MPH vs. RPM 58 MPH 3500 RPM MPH vs. RPM 72 MPH 4500 RPM Fuel Economy 1.1MPG 55 MPH Fuel Economy 0.6Mpg WOT Sound Level 88 dBA open |
Originally Posted by STRAIGHTPRIORITY
(Post 3446190)
mine with 600's tested by powerboat.
Top Speed at RPM 83.3 MPH at 5300 Acceleration in 20 sec. 72.0 MPH Mirrange Acceleration 40-70 MPH in 6.8 Sec MPH vs. RPM 58 MPH 3500 RPM MPH vs. RPM 72 MPH 4500 RPM Fuel Economy 1.1MPG 55 MPH Fuel Economy 0.6Mpg WOT Sound Level 88 dBA open |
hmmm, i think im going to add steps to my cafe over the winter. three or four should get me in to the 90's. :party-smiley-004:
|
Don't forget that there are other variables at play in some of the examples here besides just the steps. The step boats handle higher x-dimensions, and also many of the newer boats are running NXT setups.
I'd think if you had two identical hulls, one with 700 SCI's/NXT and the other with old school SSMIII's and BW-72C's, the driveline losses coupled with the extra drive drag would be such that it would take 800 hp or better to keep up. Now put the NXT's in a step boat, and then you have a 100+ mph package, where the old straight bottom with old drives and 700's is low-mid 80 mph boat. With that said, don't go trying to put NXT's on an old straight bottom. If you get the props down where they need to be the NXT gearcase turns into a speedbrake. |
Originally Posted by kreed
(Post 3446058)
Something doesnt sound right there. Should be faster....
The boat less wonder was driving:party-smiley-004: I know the retribution is gonna hurt but it will be worth it:evilb: |
What was the first year for the step?
|
Originally Posted by nova26
(Post 3449580)
What was the first year for the step?
|
Originally Posted by STRAIGHTPRIORITY
(Post 3446190)
mine with 600's tested by powerboat.
Top Speed at RPM 83.3 MPH at 5300 Acceleration in 20 sec. 72.0 MPH Mirrange Acceleration 40-70 MPH in 6.8 Sec MPH vs. RPM 58 MPH 3500 RPM MPH vs. RPM 72 MPH 4500 RPM Fuel Economy 1.1MPG 55 MPH Fuel Economy 0.6Mpg WOT Sound Level 88 dBA open The weight distribution is also so critical on a straight bottom gun. When we picked ours up from Phil, he said "Don't add any weight anywhere in this thing. A lot of time was spent on the balance of this boat." He was right. When I tell other TG owners that I set the boat at 3500rpm, tabs up and drives on 3-4, they look at me like I'm crazy. But, carbon fiber (8500lbs), cover girl cabin (all done in PVC), a little higher X-dim and good weight distribution (there are several lead plates bolted in different areas of the boat) allow it to work without porpoising. Have seen 78.4 with stock carbed 500's. |
That's good speed. I know in race trim it would just bump 80.:coolcowboy:
Originally Posted by Croozin2
(Post 3450278)
What wheels are you running SP? Drives?
The weight distribution is also so critical on a straight bottom gun. When we picked ours up from Phil, he said "Don't add any weight anywhere in this thing. A lot of time was spent on the balance of this boat." He was right. When I tell other TG owners that I set the boat at 3500rpm, tabs up and drives on 3-4, they look at me like I'm crazy. But, carbon fiber (8500lbs), cover girl cabin (all done in PVC), a little higher X-dim and good weight distribution (there are several lead plates bolted in different areas of the boat) allow it to work without porpoising. Have seen 78.4 with stock carbed 500's. |
Originally Posted by CIG3
(Post 3450346)
That's good speed. I know in race trim it would just bump 80.:coolcowboy:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.