Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Cigarette
Cafe Restore >

Cafe Restore

Notices

Cafe Restore

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-23-2014 | 05:17 PM
  #41  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 744
Likes: 1
From: MCHENRY IL
Default

67 is very respectable for stock power and drives that will run forever. I have blown up too much and needed to be towed back for years before realizing that 5-10 mph isn't worth lost boating time...
COOPS is offline  
Reply
Old 07-23-2014 | 05:54 PM
  #42  
Yamaha24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Antioch Il
Default

Originally Posted by coopsmirage
67 is very respectable for stock power and drives that will run forever. I have blown up too much and needed to be towed back for years before realizing that 5-10 mph isn't worth lost boating time...
I couldn't agree with you more, that is the reason I was leaning towards factory 525's drop those in store my 496's
if and or when the time comes drop them back in and use the 525's on a different boat
Yamaha24 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 04:50 AM
  #43  
Full Force's Avatar
Gold Member
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,691
Likes: 217
From: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Default

Originally Posted by Yamaha24
I was under the understanding that the 496 could not handle prochargers?
Stroked 496 from 454? Or merc 496's? I do know the merc 496 will about 3 lbs boost to be safe after that you gotta build the shortblocks....but yes they can handle blowers
Full Force is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 10:29 AM
  #44  
Sean's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 3
From: Darien, CT
Default

those are merc 496 HOs. from everything i read, when i owned this boat, there were not any "bolt ons" that offer any significant gain without seriously affecting the reliability...although i know raylar and whipple also had a kit at one time. i think the problem was with the computer and tuning it properly... as well as the bottom end...

67 is not bad and that is what I saw with that setup as well. if u want to go faster, sell the 496s and buy bigger power.

Last edited by Sean; 07-24-2014 at 10:35 AM.
Sean is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 11:23 AM
  #45  
Full Force's Avatar
Gold Member
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,691
Likes: 217
From: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Default

There are a few guys I know with prochargers on 496 with nonissues but you gotta keep it at 3 lbs any more forget it!!! Lol
Full Force is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 12:55 PM
  #46  
Yamaha24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Antioch Il
Default

Originally Posted by Sean
those are merc 496 HOs. from everything i read, when i owned this boat, there were not any "bolt ons" that offer any significant gain without seriously affecting the reliability...although i know raylar and whipple also had a kit at one time. i think the problem was with the computer and tuning it properly... as well as the bottom end...

67 is not bad and that is what I saw with that setup as well. if u want to go faster, sell the 496s and buy bigger power.
I read the same thing, I am just kicking around the idea of bigger stock engines that are still reliable, I really do enjoy this boat actually I love it....

A little more top end would be nice, like 74-75 then I would really LOVE IT!

Also there is no way I am redoing another boat this winter......... LOL, well at this present time. Bought for $35,000.00 and I am at right around $55,000.00 so far and counting...

Last edited by Yamaha24; 07-24-2014 at 12:58 PM.
Yamaha24 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 05:26 PM
  #47  
Sean's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 3
From: Darien, CT
Default

Originally Posted by Yamaha24
I read the same thing, I am just kicking around the idea of bigger stock engines that are still reliable, I really do enjoy this boat actually I love it....

A little more top end would be nice, like 74-75 then I would really LOVE IT!

Also there is no way I am redoing another boat this winter......... LOL, well at this present time. Bought for $35,000.00 and I am at right around $55,000.00 so far and counting...
Haha. You're still about 40k shy of what i put into it. I think i paid 45k for the boat. Add 2 brand new 496ho packages, marine machine steering, new dash and you start to get the picture...
Sean is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 05:58 PM
  #48  
J-Bonz's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,976
Likes: 495
From: Cleveland, OH / Pewaukee, WI
Default

Saw you in the no wake zone heading into Nipersink this past Sunday. The boat looked awesome! It looked super clean. I really dig the grey combo.
Jr.
J-Bonz is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 08:15 PM
  #49  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 952
Likes: 83
From: East Greenwich, RI
Default

Yamaha - the boat looks GREAT! Nice job.

How did you get the hull and deck to SHINE like that??? I would love to see mine shine.

As for speed, 67 is great. I'm only seeing 70 with 600HP (~590 at the RPM I can spin to) and Bravo 1s (1.36 ratio).
242LS is offline  
Reply
Old 07-24-2014 | 10:11 PM
  #50  
Full Force's Avatar
Gold Member
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,691
Likes: 217
From: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Default

Hull comes alive after 70... really gets out of the water and runs great!!
Full Force is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.