Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Cigarette
Mercury 700sci 2009 model, manifolds >

Mercury 700sci 2009 model, manifolds

Notices

Mercury 700sci 2009 model, manifolds

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-23-2015 | 08:22 PM
  #21  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,961
Likes: 6,444
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by frickstyle
I still don't understand how those fit on your boat and not mine, it's pretty much the same setup....
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2015 | 08:29 PM
  #22  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,961
Likes: 6,444
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by mmb
To late now but he cuts 1/4" off the exhaust flange to make more room and lowers the riser mount to keep the tail pipe at the same height. You can order the close application manifolds or the regular. Also the close application riser clamps have 1 bolt instead of 2.

That`s good info, i have a set of the close manifolds but they hit my valve covers because the valve covers sit higher due to the spring oilers. So I had to get exhaust spacers.
Did not know about the one bolt riser clamp , that would be nice. Mine keep scratching the valve covers
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2015 | 09:57 AM
  #23  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by msurf
Custom Marine told me that the headers in my boat are all custom taller leaned headers specific to that build. All 4 are "straight back" style, the front are 3" taller style, and the inside header on each engine is leaned (front leaned in, back leaned out).

I believe I have to go to the same root, which is CMI reproducing the same staff as they did for Mercury. Otherwise we will have to change all tubes after mufflers I believe, OEM will not fit.
Have sent email to Stainless marine with photos of my engine bay as well, I wait to see what they say if it fits and then decide.

You are all right about the reliability staff, it probably will be a big blow if water leaks in the cylinders in quantity..
A lot of those pipes, or headers are custom, not off the shelf headers and are specific to a certain boat. I had a ton of trouble with CMI's leaking in the past. On the last boat I had Phil at Lipship Performance install a set of Stainless Marine headers, actually the whole system. Phil's installed them on pretty much every Cigarette model so if you don't already have something set up yet maybe give him a call and see if he could answer your questions and maybe get something sent over to you. They don't look as cool as headers but I don't hear of them leaking and trashing engines either. Paying repair bills caused by leaky headers gets old fast.
tim mccray is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2015 | 08:40 PM
  #24  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 791
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Anyone ever dyno'd their setup before and after an exhaust change?
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 11-25-2015 | 01:52 AM
  #25  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,241
Likes: 2,490
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
Anyone ever dyno'd their setup before and after an exhaust change?
Switched from Gils to CMI's on a 525SC. No difference in performance.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 11-30-2015 | 08:40 AM
  #26  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 510
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by mmb
To late now but he cuts 1/4" off the exhaust flange to make more room and lowers the riser mount to keep the tail pipe at the same height. You can order the close application manifolds or the regular. Also the close application riser clamps have 1 bolt instead of 2.
I believe they were cut already, at least there was not much more we could do (no stock left to cut), in order to make them fit. Believe me, we tried everything, we even though about moving the engines apart because we had room with the driveshafts. In the end, it was more expensive to buy "new" manifolds. I think we even found out that one motor had been "tilted" away or rotated in order to make them fit on the old 454s. It was a crappy day when I got that phone call.
frickstyle is offline  
Reply
Old 11-30-2015 | 05:53 PM
  #27  
mmb
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Default

You must be tighter then 35" because I have a little under 1/2" of clearance between the risers now.
mmb is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-2015 | 07:18 AM
  #28  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 510
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

I cannot remember the exact measurement, but 35"+ comes to mind.

Off topic but what props are you running? I forget. I did the BAM calculator with what Gil told me he ran the boat at just testing, it was coming up around 10% of slip which I thought was a good number. I know the boat is underpropped now, I may pick up a pair of 32s before next season. Just curious what your baseline numbers are seeing as we have a pretty similar setup. I want to get an idea if I can push big diameter 32s just under the limiter.
frickstyle is offline  
Reply
Old 12-01-2015 | 04:20 PM
  #29  
mmb
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Default

I run 32's, it is 90mph at 5,000rpm never took it past that but I am around 3/4 throttle. Cruises 60-62 at 3500
mmb is offline  
Reply
Old 12-02-2015 | 07:11 AM
  #30  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 510
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

^^ That's what I'm going to move up to, what diameter are they? So, if you can spin them to 5700rpm, you're right at 100mph in perfect conditions, pretty cool. So are you calculating about a 10% slip? That's about where I think I am.
frickstyle is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.