Calling all Mistress owners....current and past

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

05-01-2017 | 09:46 PM

#11

Full Force

Thread Starter

Gold Member

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 11,688

Likes: 216

From: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh

Quote:

Originally Posted by TxHawk

Why do I think a 26 Bravo would be a good set to try? Ran good on big heavy 40 Ex with 650's. 75mph

Got a set to try gotta pick em up

05-02-2017 | 05:53 AM

#12

Scarab3DMC

Registered

Joined: Apr 2001

Posts: 1,849

Likes: 4

From: Boynton Beach FL

Quote:

Originally Posted by CIG3

For Top Speed the Hydromotive Quad IV is a great prop. They lack a little in the mid range but are great for big heavy "V" Bottoms like the Mistress. Plus they are right in our back yard in Macedonia, Ohio. If you are in the 650-680HP range a 26-27 would be the starting point. I ran them on a 38 KV Scarab and 38 Top Gun with that power with great success.

right on, I ran 27" Q-4 on the 34 Scarab, ran mid 70's... Tim listen to what we say!

05-02-2017 | 06:19 AM

#13

Registered

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 14,094

Likes: 3,684

From: On A Dirt Floor

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scarab3DMC

right on, I ran 27" Q-4 on the 34 Scarab, ran mid 70's... Tim listen to what we say!

Quote:

Originally Posted by CIG3

Quad IV or Quad IV-X ?

05-02-2017 | 06:53 AM

#14

Full Force

Thread Starter

Gold Member

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 11,688

Likes: 216

From: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scarab3DMC

right on, I ran 27" Q-4 on the 34 Scarab, ran mid 70's... Tim listen to what we say!

Never said I wasn't! Scarab was a lot lighter then mistress also... that's why I wanna compare to cafe mistress only... I am trying every prop I can

05-02-2017 | 07:42 AM

#15

CIG3

Registered

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 2,292

Likes: 20

From: Grand River, Ohio

The X version is designed more for step bottom boats with higher X to provide box lift. Tim should not need this with the Mistress bottom.

[QUOTE=SB;4550902]Quad IV or Quad IV