![]() |
89 Top Gun straight bottom
Ok so after two seasons with the boat I finally have the injection pretty much dial in with a lot of help from the guys at Kinsler and KE, so here is it, 572 tall deck Chev's dart 320 heads, Kinsler/Lucas large throttle body mechanical injections aka, Mercury Racing late 80's early 90's, 720 lift, 2.3 intake 1.9 exhaust jesel solid roller, 9 to 1, dry sump, running 1.5 to 1 SSM #4's inch below bottom, B blades worked merc 16 5/8 29 4 blades, boat is good and dry, never left in the water its entire life, so far turned 5600, easy, what do you guys figure she ran with 1/4 tank and two people and what do ya think she is making for HP.
|
Would love to see some pictures!
|
No idea! But interesting recipe!
|
Speed?
|
88mph - making 800hp.
|
Must have missed that somehow lol
|
that boat was a time capsul. very very cool
|
My Guess is 750HP and I say 84GPS. I believe that the 89 guns did not have a transom notch.
|
89's are notched...........not that its going to make a huge difference speed wise.
|
My calculations and radar show 91 at 5600 RPM which by my and my friends calculation is 11-12% slip and it should require about 800-825 HP to move a big heavy flat bottom to 90 plus mph, and the 89 is a notched transom which in theory allows for higher X dimensions, now the props are actually 28 4 blades that Brett at B blades tells me measure 29 inches of pitch hence the post, not sure if his work added any pitch to the props, so there you have it pretty happy with the results, Engines should spin easily to 6K so gonna keep working on the injection to see where that leads.
Some pretty good guess's Moxy |
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155612594318228&set=rpd.830033227&type=3&theater
|
I'd say, you have it pretty well dialed in,
|
No sh!t, that's a great result for that boat. You should dial mine in, something's not right with my rig, based on your results.
|
That is dialed in. I had 900's. Really high x Dimension. 3As and I could run 97.4. That was just before I sold it. It was a 1993 Gun. Never played with many props to get the last few ticks. I also could have cheated and just changed blower pulleys.....lol
|
had 0 tabs, drives at 3.5, me and 110 girl, 1/4 tank, may have run a tad over 5600, these 4 blades from b blades are the secret if you ask me, boat is way better behaved with four blades, mine are spinning out, don't know if there is any speed left spinning in, I am curious what others see for slip, example is my buddys revolution with triple 650's runs 92 with bravo 32's at 5400 witch equate to 16 or 17 % slip, now he has significantly less diameter but I'm curious about prop slip, I am also hesitant to go at higher on x as I have spacers on #4's the boat planes so well know I don't want to go back to planing problems I had with three blades
Moxy |
Mine spinning in were good for 3mph. Made no difference in planing. Good luck with your project.
|
I would try a little more diameter in your props we have found that the big V bottoms like more diameter than what you are running. we start with 18 in diameter and go from there and end up around 17.5 to 17.25 and we get our slip numbers down under 10% Regards Dan
|
I agree I had 17.75" 4 blades
|
Yup, I have a set of 18" dia 4 blades x 32pitch, drives even with bottom and cannot get on plane. HOWEVER, when it does run, showing pretty good slip numbers, 10-12%?
I need to space drives down 1-2" for usability. |
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4583510)
Yup, I have a set of 18" dia 4 blades x 32pitch, drives even with bottom and cannot get on plane. HOWEVER, when it does run, showing pretty good slip numbers, 10-12%?
I need to space drives down 1-2" for usability. |
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4583510)
Yup, I have a set of 18" dia 4 blades x 32pitch, drives even with bottom and cannot get on plane. HOWEVER, when it does run, showing pretty good slip numbers, 10-12%?
I need to space drives down 1-2" for usability. Moxy |
Justin does burnout for a mile until it hooks up, then it's on lol
|
Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
(Post 4583511)
have you got the nose to settle down yet.....
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4583554)
Justin does burnout for a mile until it hooks up, then it's on lol
|
Originally Posted by Moxy
(Post 4583518)
what are you seeing for speed, I plane at 3000 with 20-30 seconds of cavitation when over half tank and almost no cavitation with quarter tank or less, drives at 0 tabs at 2 or 3, running with 2 in spacer which nets about 1 in below bottom which ny the sounds of it is good considering my wheel's are 16 5/8 dia
Moxy Not sure yet on my top end. I think it went 92-93,mph @ 5100-5200 rpm w/30" pitch props? I've never had it WOT, in fact, the blades on the carbs aren't even opening all the way. It's like I have throttle stops, need to adjust linkage. Limiters are set @ 6,200RPM, but never had it over 5,100RPM if I can recall. Trying to run 32s but it will not get up on plane without holding it to the wood for a half mile, which I prefer not to do. So, just going to run the 30p props for now until I can install spacers and do more dialing in next season, on the setup. I am guesstimating that I have 1.4:1 drives (was told 1.5:1), which puts me around a 12% slip at above numbers? HP is at 1,080 per side. Or, if they are 1.35:1 drives, would be a 14% slip, which seems more realistic.... |
What's it do at 3500? That's where most of us run the boats. It's as fast, and for as long, as your wallet can stand. Then it's back to 3500:poopoo:
|
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4583629)
Yes, if you bury the tabs, which limit your top end considerably! So no, not really, but plan to install spacers over the winter months, see if that helps the attitude of the boat.
Correct, burnout city. Planes like sh!t, even with 18" dia props, then takes off like a rocket. the way the guys were talking about it, calling the guy by name, seemed like he was a glass guy at cigarette and he figured it out. i just can't find it yet, had to be 5-6 years ago. |
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4583636)
I would say your setup is dialed in almost perfect on this hull. Don't change a thing.
Not sure yet on my top end. I think it went 92-93,mph @ 5100-5200 rpm w/30" pitch props? I've never had it WOT, in fact, the blades on the carbs aren't even opening all the way. It's like I have throttle stops, need to adjust linkage. Limiters are set @ 6,200RPM, but never had it over 5,100RPM if I can recall. Trying to run 32s but it will not get up on plane without holding it to the wood for a half mile, which I prefer not to do. So, just going to run the 30p props for now until I can install spacers and do more dialing in next season, on the setup. I am guesstimating that I have 1.4:1 drives (was told 1.5:1), which puts me around a 12% slip at above numbers? HP is at 1,080 per side. Or, if they are 1.35:1 drives, would be a 14% slip, which seems more realistic.... Moxy |
Yes, with high X dim, I noticed fuel level plays a major role in plane-ability and top end. Must really affect the COG, a lot.
Damn, wish I would have just built huge CI fuel injected NA engines as opposed to blowers. Seems like not much payoff for all the extra HP & equipment. These boats are slugs..... |
Originally Posted by Zero Patience
(Post 4583754)
What's it do at 3500? That's where most of us run the boats. It's as fast, and for as long, as your wallet can stand. Then it's back to 3500:poopoo:
I can't remember exactly what it does at 3500, I would say 65-67mph from memory and comparing to my upper end number? Seems about right. |
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4583826)
Yes, with high X dim, I noticed fuel level plays a major role in plane-ability and top end. Must really affect the COG, a lot.
Damn, wish I would have just built huge CI fuel injected NA engines as opposed to blowers. Seems like not much payoff for all the extra HP & equipment. These boats are slugs..... |
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4583829)
It actually does really well cruising with the 32s, and hence why I want to run them as opposed to the 30s.
I can't remember exactly what it does at 3500, I would say 65-67mph from memory and comparing to my upper end number? Seems about right. Moxy |
Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
(Post 4583831)
put those in a twin step and go have some fun.....she'd be a rocket
Moxy |
where do you boat ^^^^^^
|
St Lawrence River and Lake Ontario, 1000 Islands :ernaehrung004:
|
fryckstyle not sure how you get on plane but I`ve found my boat doesn`t like a lot of tab.. 2-3 more than that the boat loses speed, prop slip goes up.. planing is over.
Once I find where a particular prop will plane I don`t waste anytime under that RPM. The props I lost had a lot of cup and I could get on plane at 3500 easily My current ones don`t have nearly as much cup (same diameter) and require 4300 . Under that and I`m just burning holes in water .. |
Also depends on whether you are in fresh or salt water, i had a set on my tiger that would pop up quick in the lower bay, but the further north and the fresher the water it struggled a bit to get up on plane...
|
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4584046)
fryckstyle not sure how you get on plane but I`ve found my boat doesn`t like a lot of tab.. 2-3 more than that the boat loses speed, prop slip goes up.. planing is over.
Once I find where a particular prop will plane I don`t waste anytime under that RPM. The props I lost had a lot of cup and I could get on plane at 3500 easily My current ones don`t have nearly as much cup (same diameter) and require 4300 . Under that and I`m just burning holes in water .. |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4584046)
fryckstyle not sure how you get on plane but I`ve found my boat doesn`t like a lot of tab.. 2-3 more than that the boat loses speed, prop slip goes up.. planing is over.
Once I find where a particular prop will plane I don`t waste anytime under that RPM. The props I lost had a lot of cup and I could get on plane at 3500 easily My current ones don`t have nearly as much cup (same diameter) and require 4300 . Under that and I`m just burning holes in water .. I've experimented with, and purchased: 30pitch props - stock as far as I can tell 32pitch props - stock as far as I can tell 32pitch props - sent to bblades to add "cup" All merc 18" 4 blades (some measure 17.75", but sold to me as 18" props) The 30s seems most usable, with the 32s showing a faster cruise and more efficiency. The 30s feel to accelerate faster. Boat comes out of the water pretty easy too. (meaning getting airtime, still hesitates getting on plane) |
Originally Posted by frickstyle
(Post 4584471)
I tried everything, not much change in tab position with the 32s. I get what you're saying, I just think it's too heavy for such a high drive setting. I really want 1" spacers, but have a pair of 2" spacers sitting in the box. Will probably install over the winter and try it out this Spring.
I've experimented with, and purchased: 30pitch props - stock as far as I can tell 32pitch props - stock as far as I can tell 32pitch props - sent to bblades to add "cup" All merc 18" 4 blades (some measure 17.75", but sold to me as 18" props) The 30s seems most usable, with the 32s showing a faster cruise and more efficiency. The 30s feel to accelerate faster. Boat comes out of the water pretty easy too. (meaning getting airtime, still hesitates getting on plane) |
Dan, do you have any 29 pitch 18" dia 4 blade props? From playing around with the prop slip calculator, I think my drives are 1.4:1.
Anyone think 1.4:1 is causing slight planing issues? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.