Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Cigarette
42 Tiger TS versus  38 TG TS  comparison >

42 Tiger TS versus 38 TG TS comparison

Notices

42 Tiger TS versus 38 TG TS comparison

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-31-2022 | 02:14 PM
  #11  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 891
Default

Originally Posted by jbraun2828
And I would rather have yours any day than a twin step tiger.
must be the ceramic coating

1MOSES1 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2022 | 02:51 PM
  #12  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

A straight bottom 42 is an Apache twin. They don’t get as much love despite being much newer.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2022 | 06:00 PM
  #13  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 303
Likes: 69
From: southern NH
Default

I owned a 2001 TS Tiger for 7 years and only ever had it porpoise when in flat lake water trimmed out. The boat was an absolute wave crusher and loved the rough stuff. It does not have a balance problem but the early models had a little more lift in the front to ride over waves rather than through them. i've been on a lot of different boats over the years and haven't had one ride as nice in the bigger water. I just bought a new boat and sold the tiger (hope I didn't make a mistake). I did keep blowing drives the first 3 years and changed to Imco SCX Extremes and solved the problem. Had the uppers on 4 years before any rebuilding and changed the lower gears every season as preventative maintenance. Seemed like I had more room in the engine compartment then my friends 38TG, Also the door to the cabin was bigger, Had 2 big lockers in cabin.
outlw36 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2022 | 06:56 PM
  #14  
seafordguy's Avatar
Gold Member
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,119
Likes: 960
From: Seaford, VA
Default

I can’t speak to the T/S boats (beyond my pay grade) but my flat bottom tiger definitely porpoises without a good amount of trim. I can’t compare it to a TG either but I can compare it to my Cafe and there was a significant size difference. 42 is plenty more to tow that’s for sure.


seafordguy is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2022 | 05:46 AM
  #15  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,755
Likes: 152
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by outlw36
I owned a 2001 TS Tiger for 7 years and only ever had it porpoise when in flat lake water trimmed out. The boat was an absolute wave crusher and loved the rough stuff. It does not have a balance problem but the early models had a little more lift in the front to ride over waves rather than through them. i've been on a lot of different boats over the years and haven't had one ride as nice in the bigger water. I just bought a new boat and sold the tiger (hope I didn't make a mistake). I did keep blowing drives the first 3 years and changed to Imco SCX Extremes and solved the problem. Had the uppers on 4 years before any rebuilding and changed the lower gears every season as preventative maintenance. Seemed like I had more room in the engine compartment then my friends 38TG, Also the door to the cabin was bigger, Had 2 big lockers in cabin.
And how cool was the electric sliding cabin door !!!! It was like someone discovered gold when I saw that for the first time! HAHAHA....
kreed is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2022 | 07:06 AM
  #16  
offshoredrillin's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,314
Likes: 1,556
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by outlw36
I owned a 2001 TS Tiger for 7 years and only ever had it porpoise when in flat lake water trimmed out. The boat was an absolute wave crusher and loved the rough stuff. It does not have a balance problem but the early models had a little more lift in the front to ride over waves rather than through them. i've been on a lot of different boats over the years and haven't had one ride as nice in the bigger water. I just bought a new boat and sold the tiger (hope I didn't make a mistake). I did keep blowing drives the first 3 years and changed to Imco SCX Extremes and solved the problem. Had the uppers on 4 years before any rebuilding and changed the lower gears every season as preventative maintenance. Seemed like I had more room in the engine compartment then my friends 38TG, Also the door to the cabin was bigger, Had 2 big lockers in cabin.
the side by sides did well, once they tried to stagger them, there was a cog issue, thats when they did the 42X... there were only a few stagger tigers and they didnt handle well at all.
offshoredrillin is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2022 | 07:08 AM
  #17  
offshoredrillin's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,314
Likes: 1,556
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by 1MOSES1
must be the ceramic coating

because its quality, something you know nothing about... because its not on the shelf at walmart.
offshoredrillin is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2022 | 07:22 AM
  #18  
cigrocket's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 173
From: Endicott, NY
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
A straight bottom 42 is an Apache twin. They don’t get as much love despite being much newer.
It is the Apache Twin, Except that the Apaches were Rigged with SPEEDMASTERS and TRANSMISSIONS and could handle the Horsepower. You figure all APACHE's in that size range have at least 700HP. No Proposing because of the CG and the Weight of the RUNNING GEAR!
cigrocket is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2022 | 10:41 AM
  #19  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 303
Likes: 69
From: southern NH
Default

Originally Posted by kreed
And how cool was the electric sliding cabin door !!!! It was like someone discovered gold when I saw that for the first time! HAHAHA....
Liked the steps in the door as well.
outlw36 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2022 | 10:52 AM
  #20  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,806
Likes: 891
Default

Originally Posted by offshoredrillin
because its quality, something you know nothing about... because its not on the shelf at walmart.


1MOSES1 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.