Operation 87 Cafe rescue
04-05-2024 | 12:16 PM
#123
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 641
Likes: 445
From: Tullahoma Tennessee
Yep!
I for sure was not expecting to lay down those numbers my goal was 550 or so but he over delivered! I was more than happy about the outcome! Should make this ol heavy girl move along nicely all things considered!
04-05-2024 | 12:49 PM
#125
"Unregistered Gun"
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 225
From: Paducah, Ky
04-05-2024 | 01:43 PM
#128
Platinum Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 1,457
From: Virginia Beach
The banner shows “corrected power” above the numbers. There should be a correction factor recorded somewhere on the sheet.
The correction factor takes into consideration deviations from configuration specifics that are baked into the dyno’s calculations. It accounts for temperature, barometric pressure, and so on.
Not trying to rain on the parade, but those are pretty big numbers for a 460 that will be tolerant of a heavy pleasure boat. Yours are making about 1.35 lbs ft per cube. 1.20 would probably be a more expected number - I’d look to see if the correction factor was turned up and then ask why. This is well into 500+ CID territory and very impressive.
Only asking because others will surely want to duplicate what you’ve done here, myself included.
The correction factor takes into consideration deviations from configuration specifics that are baked into the dyno’s calculations. It accounts for temperature, barometric pressure, and so on.
Not trying to rain on the parade, but those are pretty big numbers for a 460 that will be tolerant of a heavy pleasure boat. Yours are making about 1.35 lbs ft per cube. 1.20 would probably be a more expected number - I’d look to see if the correction factor was turned up and then ask why. This is well into 500+ CID territory and very impressive.
Only asking because others will surely want to duplicate what you’ve done here, myself included.
04-05-2024 | 01:52 PM
#129
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 641
Likes: 445
From: Tullahoma Tennessee
Cool!
The banner shows “corrected power” above the numbers. There should be a correction factor recorded somewhere on the sheet.
The correction factor takes into consideration deviations from configuration specifics that are baked into the dyno’s calculations. It accounts for temperature, barometric pressure, and so on.
Not trying to rain on the parade, but those are pretty big numbers for a 460 that will be tolerant of a heavy pleasure boat. Yours are making about 1.35 lbs ft per cube. 1.20 would probably be a more expected number - I’d look to see if the correction factor was turned up and then ask why. This is well into 500+ CID territory and very impressive.
Only asking because others will surely want to duplicate what you’ve done here, myself included.
The correction factor takes into consideration deviations from configuration specifics that are baked into the dyno’s calculations. It accounts for temperature, barometric pressure, and so on.
Not trying to rain on the parade, but those are pretty big numbers for a 460 that will be tolerant of a heavy pleasure boat. Yours are making about 1.35 lbs ft per cube. 1.20 would probably be a more expected number - I’d look to see if the correction factor was turned up and then ask why. This is well into 500+ CID territory and very impressive.
Only asking because others will surely want to duplicate what you’ve done here, myself included.
04-07-2024 | 12:47 PM
#130
VIP Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 892
Likes: 83
From: Maine
