Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Do It Yourself, Boating on a Budget
496 Stroker - Help me with a reasonable build >

496 Stroker - Help me with a reasonable build

Notices

496 Stroker - Help me with a reasonable build

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-15-2011 | 04:18 PM
  #11  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota, FL
Default

wow, w/the $$$$ you're speding I'd a gone w/diesels!
Far more economical and will def meet your TQ specs.
JMO
high bid is offline  
Reply
Old 02-15-2011 | 04:49 PM
  #12  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 20
From: Millstadt, IL
Default

Originally Posted by high bid
wow, w/the $$$$ you're speding I'd a gone w/diesels!
Far more economical and will def meet your TQ specs.
JMO
That would be a cool project, not many guys run diesels
jeffswav is offline  
Reply
Old 02-15-2011 | 05:34 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

I hear Ya,
I actually did consider it and priced it out but the costs were out of this world to convert. It was 70K to convert to a pair of Cummins B series. I know this may be hard to believe but after running all the prop, transmission and performance numbers my boat will actually cruise a bit faster with the gas strokers. Of course I'll be getting only about .65 gals per mile with gas as opposed to a better 1 mile per gallon with the Cummins. But with diesel costing more than gas plus the 70K it just doesn't make sense for me.
rrrwel is offline  
Reply
Old 02-15-2011 | 06:10 PM
  #14  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,257
Likes: 2,506
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by rrrwel
Thanks,

Learning a lot here. How would I go about lowering the CR down to 9.0? Should I be looking at the cam specs that jeff1000 posted on his dyno sheet? I do always run 89 octane.
You just have to get different pistons to lower the CR. You can also make small CR changes with head gasket thickness and porting the combustion chambers.

I would get with Bob Mandera/rmbuilder on the best cam for what you want. I would think a cam with a 114 lob sep would have a flatter torque curve and maybe something with more like a .580 lift. That way it makes its peak power and torque lower in the rpm range where you need it.
Griff is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.