more hp
12-27-2012, 08:07 PM
#21
Registered
iTrader: (3)
Best bang for buck imo!
Matter of fact, I think mine idle, start better, and more docile than my buddies hopped up 420's. that's with 300 more ponies too. MPG, well, I lose that one.
12-27-2012, 08:11 PM
#22
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes
on
132 Posts
I hear ya...Been running blowers though for 5-6 seasons. Its all in the setup. No issues with breaking stuff.
Best bang for buck imo!
Matter of fact, I think mine idle, start better, and more docile than my buddies hopped up 420's. that's with 300 more ponies too. MPG, well, I lose that one.
Best bang for buck imo!
Matter of fact, I think mine idle, start better, and more docile than my buddies hopped up 420's. that's with 300 more ponies too. MPG, well, I lose that one.
12-27-2012, 08:12 PM
#23
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes
on
132 Posts
I love the challenge of squeezing the most I can out of simple combos without going broke... To run 65 in mine now with the power I have is pretty good considering everyone said I would be lucky to hit 60-62 with my power... Love the challenge!!
12-27-2012, 08:19 PM
#24
Registered
iTrader: (3)
Ya that's not bad. My old 40' hawk with 400's best ever was like 61mph. My old 402 Formula weighed in at 16k lbs with no fuel on the trailer. With 600's, it ran a solid 68-70. which wasnt bad. with 400's those 402's did 53-55 on a good day. The TRS didnt like that boat though. I know all about the big old wave crushers!!
12-27-2012, 08:28 PM
#25
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes
on
132 Posts
Ya that's not bad. My old 40' hawk with 400's best ever was like 61mph. My old 402 Formula weighed in at 16k lbs with no fuel on the trailer. With 600's, it ran a solid 68-70. which wasnt bad. with 400's those 402's did 53-55 on a good day. The TRS didnt like that boat though. I know all about the big old wave crushers!!
12-31-2012, 09:21 AM
#26
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is it worth wild to have stock heads decked and deshoud valves and polish combustion chambers or better off going to new heads
other things are change cam to crane132596 valve spring crane 99893intake edelbrock RPM air gap and crower ioler hydraulic lifters
does this make sence
other things are change cam to crane132596 valve spring crane 99893intake edelbrock RPM air gap and crower ioler hydraulic lifters
does this make sence
Last edited by cig20; 12-31-2012 at 09:35 AM.
12-31-2012, 04:31 PM
#30
Registered
iTrader: (4)
You are putting a 420 cam back in. What are you trying to accomplish? If you are replacing the cam and want to achieve more HP without going to hydraulic roller why are you using the same cam? I thought you wanted to achieve 525? Same cam same heads will result in same HP.
Do a search "330 on roids" there are a few flat tappet cams in that thread.
Do a search "330 on roids" there are a few flat tappet cams in that thread.
Last edited by Rookie; 12-31-2012 at 04:34 PM.
