Notices

Interesting dyno tests

Old 01-04-2017 | 04:16 AM
  #1  
Sonic30ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 165
From: SWFL
Default Interesting dyno tests

http://www.hotrod.com/articles/big-b...ead-dyno-test/
Sonic30ss is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2017 | 08:52 PM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Some good info. Some people, builders frown on the 4.600 4.375 6.535 I like the 582 combo but endurance is questionable. Regardless the info and components can translate to similar builds. Good info. Hard to believe airgap intake got the hp but all in all a 582 with 10 plus to 1 comp should make easily 750. Other thing I noticed was no rpm's were mentioned. I didn't like that but still good info. Tks for posting. Should move over to QA.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2017 | 08:57 PM
  #3  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

I take that back. I did see some rpm's. I still find it hard to believe the airgap kicked the chit out of the sniper jr. I need to review a little more cause of head change so not sure if chamber size changed with or not. Regardless these number claimed are realistic unlike many I see. Like the 540 pump gas 800 hp under 6k etc.

Last edited by getrdunn; 01-10-2017 at 09:03 PM.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2017 | 09:07 PM
  #4  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,104
Likes: 3,692
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

On the water Vic Jr's make more power (ie: more speed) on even more common and much smaller 425-450hp 454's. Yes, samme people and boats that swapped nothing but a vic r in place of the airgap. Added bonus fuel distribution way better too...so, not sure what to make of those dyno tests.
SB is online now  
Reply
Old 01-11-2017 | 03:24 PM
  #5  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

You could think their full of chit like 90 % or more of those test you see are. Can't remember which OSO member was saying about the airgaps but they remarked how terrible they were for efficiency and off extremely far from port to port. Thought it was even you SB. I've never ran one so I couldn't say. Now I have done a back to back on stock merc 365 mag intake vs dart and top end rpm was the same but dart less responsive on stock engine.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-2017 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
14 apache's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 15
From: Northport N.Y.
Default

That's pretty impressive numbers.
14 apache is offline  
Reply
Old 01-15-2017 | 12:13 PM
  #7  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

That dual plane airgap has been impressive, and showing better graphs than the single planes except for the very very top end.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2017 | 07:16 PM
  #8  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
That dual plane airgap has been impressive, and showing better graphs than the single planes except for the very very top end.
I've argued that with some of the best with under 500 ci but finallly gave in. I've never heard much about it on larger cubic inch engines. Matter of fact I honestly don't think any except for this link. I always thought they made good since for marine engines but once again look at merc 500 plus builds. Application could vary I suppose but a twin app 540 notta unless deep drive heavy boat but even then....
getrdunn is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.