Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Do It Yourself, Boating on a Budget
Gen 6 540 or Blueprint 632 in Magnum 27, Reversion? >

Gen 6 540 or Blueprint 632 in Magnum 27, Reversion?

Notices

Gen 6 540 or Blueprint 632 in Magnum 27, Reversion?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-27-2026 | 06:26 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 6
From: West Bridgewater,MA
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
They will not endorse the idea. You’ll be on your own. A 1 of 1 experiment. But like I said, some street and strip car guys have run them up to 30k miles. So that’s encouraging. But you are going to put far more high rpm hours on them. The springs are daringly light. Kinda how Merc did it too though.
I Know they won't endorse the idea. I'm just wondering what the differences are between their marine offering and street version. Is it just the cam and compression ratio (and probably head gasket and freeze plug material) or do they clearance the bottom end differently.
CMG223 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 06:29 AM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 6
From: West Bridgewater,MA
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
This blower may fit under you hatch. 700hp on a 502 easy. You might be able to reuse your crank too depending on what it is.

https://theblowershop.com/shop/super...2v-street-8mm/
The 502 I have spun a bearing. I was about to drop it to the machine shop when this marketplace 632 popped up. I'm assuming the crank is toast so I thought might as well put a bigger crank in it. Im not looking to go 100 mph. Maybe mid 80's so i can cruise fast. Its hard to get a straight answer on how much power that will take with my setup. I think 750Hp will do it but we'll see. Thanks for all your help. I'll check out that blower. The snout might be all up in the back seat lip.
CMG223 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 06:45 AM
  #13  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 683
Default

we run a sort of similar boat a 25 or 26 thunder xr drive and basicaly an open class 540 na right in the 800hp range but we killed torque down low and let it wind up over 6500 its a blast fun and stable and reliable
boostbros is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 10:18 AM
  #14  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,418
Likes: 3,938
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

Originally Posted by CMG223
I did see this. Were you thinking the added height would interfere with my hatch? Does the raised exhaust port height typically affect how the exhaust holes line up?
If Im reading their description correctly, yes exhaust alignment issues............300 + .700 = approx 11/16 of an inch. ........thats a big thumper cam, Id get a dyno sheet and find out where it makes peak and torque.........my guess is peak hp is in the 6500 to 7k range

Last edited by F-2 Speedy; 03-27-2026 at 10:20 AM.
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 10:23 AM
  #15  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 786
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
If Im reading their description correctly, yes exhaust alignment issues............300 + .700 = approx 11/16 of an inch. ........thats a big thumper cam, Id get a dyno sheet and find out where it makes peak and torque.........my guess is peak hp is in the 6500 to 7k range

hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 11:43 AM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 6
From: West Bridgewater,MA
Default

Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
If Im reading their description correctly, yes exhaust alignment issues............300 + .700 = approx 11/16 of an inch. ........thats a big thumper cam, Id get a dyno sheet and find out where it makes peak and torque.........my guess is peak hp is in the 6500 to 7k range
OK I read it as the exhaust is .300 higher, just over 1/4". I didn't realize you added it the deck height as well.

I just talked to BluePrint. They said they've had quite a few people run this engine in a boat with "great success". He knew all about reversion and sad that street Cam is borderline so keep an eye on it. The only difference between the marine and street versions is the cam and a thicker stainless head gasket to dump down the CR a bit.
CMG223 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 11:52 AM
  #17  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,418
Likes: 3,938
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

I was going to mention possible head gasket change to lower compression........... 10.2 vs a 9.8 deck then ad the raised ex port is a pretty good jump.............plus the tall deck is a little over an inch wider, but its doable with custom tails
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 12:03 PM
  #18  
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,459
Likes: 2,089
From: SW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by CMG223
The 502 I have spun a bearing. I was about to drop it to the machine shop when this marketplace 632 popped up. I'm assuming the crank is toast so I thought might as well put a bigger crank in it. Im not looking to go 100 mph. Maybe mid 80's so i can cruise fast. Its hard to get a straight answer on how much power that will take with my setup. I think 750Hp will do it but we'll see. Thanks for all your help. I'll check out that blower. The snout might be all up in the back seat lip.
CMG223,

Not that we don't all love Roots blowers, but I'm betting you'll never get that blower under your lid, given it's got a carb and breather on top of it. The Whipple is going to be a more likely candidate, as long as you go EFI, as the intake is on the back of the blower, not on top. They also generally have a flatter torque curve than a Roots with a higher effective RPM range. the Roots are low end torque monsters, but they run out of steam at higher RPMs. they also typically use narrower rib belts as opposed to cog belts, which might be just the space you need behind your seat.

If you are ultimately limited to NA, my reading and listening would lead me to advise against the 632. Just too high a rod angle. There have been guys do it, but I think it's always been to less-than-stellar long-term results. A well-built 540, or 565 if you can squeeze it out of your block, will suit a marine application better. I know my dream engine would be a Dart BigM 565, 4-3/8" stoke and 4.530" bore, hydraulic roller build. But I'm stuck with an otherwise stock 496/8.1 GM block and heads, and a CFO that has already discovered the edge of the checkbook and doesn't feel she needs her knuckles any whiter.

Thanks. Brad.
Brad Christy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 03:15 PM
  #19  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 6
From: West Bridgewater,MA
Default

Originally Posted by Brad Christy
CMG223,

Not that we don't all love Roots blowers, but I'm betting you'll never get that blower under your lid, given it's got a carb and breather on top of it. The Whipple is going to be a more likely candidate, as long as you go EFI, as the intake is on the back of the blower, not on top. They also generally have a flatter torque curve than a Roots with a higher effective RPM range. the Roots are low end torque monsters, but they run out of steam at higher RPMs. they also typically use narrower rib belts as opposed to cog belts, which might be just the space you need behind your seat.

If you are ultimately limited to NA, my reading and listening would lead me to advise against the 632. Just too high a rod angle. There have been guys do it, but I think it's always been to less-than-stellar long-term results. A well-built 540, or 565 if you can squeeze it out of your block, will suit a marine application better. I know my dream engine would be a Dart BigM 565, 4-3/8" stoke and 4.530" bore, hydraulic roller build. But I'm stuck with an otherwise stock 496/8.1 GM block and heads, and a CFO that has already discovered the edge of the checkbook and doesn't feel she needs her knuckles any whiter.

Thanks. Brad.
Thanks Brad,

That's good to know about the rod angle. I'm hoping to keep this a fairly budget orientated build. Thats why a Big cube Dart block or EFI whipple set up was crossed off the list early on. Ideally I'd like to use my gen 6 502 because I already have a carb and intake that would work. All my accessories and exhaust would transfer over. I might just stick with that route. Go buy a 540 rotating assembly, a nice cam and some decent aluminum heads and see what I can do with it. I just didn't want to spend a bunch of money and in the end wish I had another 100Hp.
Its kind of a unique setup so figuring how much power it'll take to go 80-85 isn't well documented

Thanks
Chris
CMG223 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-27-2026 | 03:17 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 6
From: West Bridgewater,MA
Default

Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
I was going to mention possible head gasket change to lower compression........... 10.2 vs a 9.8 deck then ad the raised ex port is a pretty good jump.............plus the tall deck is a little over an inch wider, but its doable with custom tails
Good to know. My CMI's are the 1 piece header/tail combo so there isn't much wiggle room at the transom. Thanks for the info.
CMG223 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.