Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
BravoOne or BravoThree? Which is better for Cigarette 35 Hull? >

BravoOne or BravoThree? Which is better for Cigarette 35 Hull?

Notices

BravoOne or BravoThree? Which is better for Cigarette 35 Hull?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-10-2009 | 02:21 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Palermo, Italy
Default

Thank you, Darrell, an efficient cruising speed is my performance goal, because 90% of time I cruise at 30/35 knots and I would like to have my best efficiency in this range.

About my top speed, listening to MercuryPropSelector, it should be 57mph at full load (1500lbs people and gear, 200 gallons fuel) , and 64mph at minimum load (500lbs + 25 gal).
Gimbo007 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-2009 | 09:51 AM
  #12  
hoozeyurdaddy's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
From: price, utah
Default

as long as the top speed is around the 65ish, B3 is the best choice, above 65 the bullet will cause the rear prop to blowout and loose all efficiency, but it will give the best hole shot and cruise as stated.
hoozeyurdaddy is offline  
Reply
Old 06-11-2009 | 02:32 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Palermo, Italy
Default

Maybe the New Bravo Three 4 blades front prop could be better for high speed efficiency, always remaining the best choice for medium range cruise.
Gimbo007 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-15-2009 | 05:11 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Palermo, Italy
Default

Someone told me BravoThree's have overheating problems at high speeds.

Is it true?

Maybe I could use drive's shower to solve this problem.
Gimbo007 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-28-2009 | 05:31 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Palermo, Italy
Default

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...ml#post2941408
Gimbo007 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2009 | 10:33 AM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Palermo, Italy
Question

After 28pitch props (going 56mph @4300) I tested a new set of 26pitch props, with good results:

The hole shot is better, with less effort for the engines, and at same cruise speed the fuel consumption is 5% less.

Not remarkable changes about top speed, always 57/58 mph at 300rpm plus (4700rpm).

I'm going to test also a set of 24 pitch prop but I don't if Standard, Cupped or Four Blade Front Prop.

What do you think about?
Gimbo007 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.