Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
Drive Ratio and Durability - Any correlation??? >

Drive Ratio and Durability - Any correlation???

Notices

Drive Ratio and Durability - Any correlation???

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-29-2010 | 10:38 AM
  #1  
fantastixvoyage's Avatar
Thread Starter
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,219
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Default Drive Ratio and Durability - Any correlation???

I have been pondering this and was hoping maybe there were some answers out there.

With the same given torque does drive ratios affect the durability of the drive? Meaning could one expect more, same or less durability from a 1.65 vs 1.36, etc????

Just wondering this as my boat (single vee, 700hp) seems to work fine with a 1.36. Debating switching to a more typical 1.5 and wondering what if any affect that would have on the longevity of the drive (everything else being equal - parts, labor, hours, etc).
fantastixvoyage is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-2010 | 02:44 PM
  #2  
blue thunder's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 6
From: IBX
Default

I remember back on the alpha drives that were installed behind BBC, they ran 1.36 gears because they were stronger. More meat. I'm unsure if that holds true with the bravo as the top cap is the weakest link, not the gears so much.
blue thunder is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-2010 | 03:58 PM
  #3  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Default

Gears not weak in a bravo??? Even on an XR the gears are the weak link.

The closer to 1:1 the stronger the gear set. in an auto diff the pinion gear is larger the higher the gear ratio (lower numerically). 1:36 should be stronger if the pinion gear is larger.

Keep in mind that one of the issues with the bravo gears is the face galling off...not just the strength.
JRider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-30-2010 | 04:01 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Default

Gears not weak in a bravo??? Even on an XR the gears are the weak link.

The closer to 1:1 the stronger the gear set. in an auto diff the pinion gear is larger the higher the gear ratio (lower numerically). 1:36 should be stronger if the pinion gear is larger.

Keep in mind that one of the issues with the bravo gears is the face galling off...not just the strength.
JRider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-31-2010 | 11:47 PM
  #5  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,345
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

if u r willing to change your x dimension then the answer is yes. dynamic loading + - is a huge factor in durability. prop blades have a major influence in vibration and the order of. it's all about amplitude and frequency ( xr gears have more than xz's by the way) from the engine to the prop factors into the equation and needs to be assessed as a system and not individual components . installing aftermarket parts are bandaids. just as a #6.

ps. i took a 30% failure rate bravo race team to a ZERO % failure rate.
audacity is offline  
Reply
Old 08-01-2010 | 10:29 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Default

I had hear that a 1:50 XR upper with a 1:50 lower is stronger or puts less stress on the upper than using a 1:36 lower. I also heard the gears were cut differently. But I do not know this for a fact.
J.P. is offline  
Reply
Old 08-01-2010 | 03:08 PM
  #7  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,345
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

gear ratio is in the lower
audacity is offline  
Reply
Old 08-01-2010 | 07:40 PM
  #8  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 965
Likes: 8
From: Osage Beach, MO
Default

Originally Posted by audacity
gear ratio is in the lower
only on the XR models
QWKRN U is offline  
Reply
Old 08-01-2010 | 08:03 PM
  #9  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by audacity
if u r willing to change your x dimension then the answer is yes. dynamic loading + - is a huge factor in durability. prop blades have a major influence in vibration and the order of. it's all about amplitude and frequency ( xr gears have more than xz's by the way) from the engine to the prop factors into the equation and needs to be assessed as a system and not individual components . installing aftermarket parts are bandaids. just as a #6.

ps. i took a 30% failure rate bravo race team to a ZERO % failure rate.
So the the secret is reducing vibration and shock load? Are you saying the xz upper gears have less vibration? As far as adjusting the X...are you saying to go deeper to reduce vibration?
JRider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-01-2010 | 08:39 PM
  #10  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,345
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

more blades reduce vibration.

proper engine and shaft installation reduces vibration. by the way i wrote a global 8D that was published globally about this.

stand off boxes greatly increase dynamic loading.

zx gears are bevel gears=lower vibration than a straight cut gear like the xr's. the xr are more durable.

you can pop the caps and look at gear wear. if there is a pattern? you can remove the stress riser and flip the gears and run the backside of them.

if anyone is having bravo issues i can come in and asses the system and make recommendations.

the data i have collected on bravo's is extensive. tracking every part in them as well. our race boats have NEVER been out of the water without the drives being rebuilt. if the boat ran for 15 min the drives would come down. some of the smallest cheapest parts can cause a massive failure that will tell you nothing.
audacity is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.