Bravo 3 to Bravo 1 conversion question
#14
Registered
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 3
From: OFallon,Mo.
#15
VIP Member

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,176
Likes: 333
From: ankeny,ia.
It produces a 1.81, 2:1 and 2.2:1 with a bravo 3 lower....the upper doesn't care which lower it's mated to
#17
Registered

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,345
Likes: 191
The upper CAN care what lower it is mated to! You need to be aware of "oiler" vs. "non-oiler" compatibility. Just sayin.
#18
Gold Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
What is you application that your talking about...if you take off a bravo 3 gearcase and install a bravo 1 gearcase you WILL lose acceleration out of the hole..there is a reason mercury installed a bravo 3 to begin with. On larger heavier applications especially single engine applications going from a bravo 3 to a bravo 1 will turn the boat into a sled out of the hole..secondly all bravo drives and transom are not the same..there are seriel breaks just like glenamy 242 states plus x series are different. I did a bunch of testing on a 27 formula single dts engine and I took off a bravo 3 gearcase and for testing purposes installed a bravo 1 gearcase and I could have eaten a 2 course meal in the time it took to plane that boat off..not quite that bad but you get the picture..if you aren't concerned with acceleration and are trying to achieve top end you can change x heights to get there but that's a whole different conversation for another day.



