![]() |
Originally Posted by Rik
(Post 3512963)
That 52" is correct but it is only 4" longer than Bravo on a box, which would be a similar setup not the 12" misleading statement. Also, you are the one bagging on the price while not bringing into light the benefits it brings nor the fact that it is less than a complete new Bravo or BMAX assembly on the boat. Not to mention the SPEED increase that the Arneson will have over the current setup!
Also, this thread was started by someone with a FOUNTAIN not a BT so I don't see how you can bring that into this discussion. I agree stick to the topic but as you pointed out and any proof or lack there of on a BT has no relevance on a Fountain. |
3 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by skydog
(Post 3512971)
Hey guys is a bmax drive lots stronger than a Teague platinum XR drive?
Thank u |
Originally Posted by articfriends
(Post 3512745)
I'm impressed, is your lower gear set a 17/19 then? The 15/19 1.50 gears I run used to last 10-12 hours with a little over 1000 hp and ft lbs of tq, I stretched this out to 40-60 hours or so by experimenting with different processes and settled on cryo/iso rem finishing along with premium synthetic oil (currently running the bravo shop stuff but was running Amsoil). I did switch to 1.36 lower gears that were cryoed, isoed and dlc coated this year and was eager to see how they held up but then I sheared off a billet vert shaft which destroyed everything in the lower including the case and gears so I am back to running the 1.50 gears. Im asking about your set-up because I am always curious in what works out there and what don't. I sheared off a billet prop shaft turning alot less prop too so you are doing pretty good, Smitty
|
[QUOTE=lvrepoman;3512634]28' scarab excel-
Datalogger shows 46 to 133.8 in 14.4 seconds, within 2280', with the throttle never exceeding 77%. /QUOTE] That is just retarded! :drink::drink: |
[QUOTE=JasonSmith;3514226]
Originally Posted by lvrepoman
(Post 3512634)
28' scarab excel-
Datalogger shows 46 to 133.8 in 14.4 seconds, within 2280', with the throttle never exceeding 77%. /QUOTE] That is just retarded! :drink::drink: |
Originally Posted by lvrepoman
(Post 3514164)
As far as the lower ratio goes, I'm not sure but I think it's the 15/19 set. I think the final ratio is set in the upper on the bmax, but you'd have to check with John to be sure. I do run the neo oil, I just check it more often than johns recommendation. As far as the shafts go, I see a lot of slip down low with my setup- my slip doesn't get any better until I get past 100... I think that might be why I'm not twisting everything all to hell. My combo also doesn't make a ton of low end torque, just tons of power on the big end. I do think that rigidity in the lower gear case is paramount to the life of these drives. I've had this lower off and apart (nothing important, just a cav plate prop stretch mishap), and I've had several of the competitors lowers in my hands. Johns lower physically weighs more while maintaining similar dimensions to the competition. All that tells me is that it's a more dense casting that has to be stronger. Case in point, I have 2 shorty lowers in my garage that have 6-7" vertical cracks that run parallel to the vertical shaft. Both cases are damaged in the bearing area, and neither are reparable. Did the gear fail and wipe out the case, or did e case fail and let the gear walk causing the gear to bind and fail? You be the judge on that one. All I know for sure, is that almost every aftermarket upgrade drive out there uses the same xr lower set. All of the others I've tried have failed, and generally I'm under 2 hours despite my driving style. This one has not in over 40 hours of abuse. I know John has certain processes he uses on the lower gears, I can't say if it helps or not. I also know he uses the neo oil exclusively, and I sampled several brands under a scope before and after running it. The neo is very resilient to abuse. Only more time will tell how it will hold up. With all that said, his drive is alive where others would have been dead already. Before I got ahold of John, I was searching for everything I was going to need to swap to a #6 drive. The first conversation I had with John basically described my desire to not have to throw everything in the trash when something broke. His answer was this, you will break my drive- I can't say when or what for sure, my guess is the lower gears... But I do think it will live longer than what you've been running. Everyone else I spoke with said no problem- you won't break my drive. I appreciate honesty, it goes a long way with me.
|
Just a note,
The SCX uses their own lower gear set, not the XR's gears. |
Originally Posted by Mr Gadgets
(Post 3514272)
Just a note,
The SCX uses their own lower gear set, not the XR's gears. |
been reading this thread,and one question comes to mind=is the xr outdrive too cheaply built,or are we just asking too much of it?...merc does say 600hp....im curious to hear opinions,as i'll be facing similar problems,with 640hp spinning a standard b1...i was looking for an xr or xz....
|
Originally Posted by pqjack
(Post 3514632)
been reading this thread,and one question comes to mind=is the xr outdrive too cheaply built,or are we just asking too much of it?...merc does say 600hp....im curious to hear opinions,as i'll be facing similar problems,with 640hp spinning a standard b1...i was looking for an xr or xz....
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.