Are the sweptback Bravos faster than the old style?
#12
If you are running same prop, same drive ratio, and are still running same rpm, I'd think it's a setup or trim issue. Not seeing how hp will come into play here
__________________
Some people are like Slinkies - Not really good for anything, but they
bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
Some people are like Slinkies - Not really good for anything, but they
bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs.
#14
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 550
From: Cape Coral FL
There was no damage to the hull at all. I did, however have the bottom of the boat buffed and waxed to help keep the river water stains off. I know that's not optimal for speed, but I wouldn't think it would cost 6mph.
As far as the trim, I can still trim it up enough to blow out the prop just like I could before.
It is a single engine boat, GPS speedometer
As far as the trim, I can still trim it up enough to blow out the prop just like I could before.
It is a single engine boat, GPS speedometer
#16
The wrong wax will slow a boat a lot more than you would think. Wax is the wrong thing to put on the bottom of your boat. Wet sand for speed. They used to make a bottom coating that when I used it I would see about 3 MPH gain BUT they stopped making it because it was made with a chemical that was banned in the USA. ( OZONE depleting )
#17
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 550
From: Cape Coral FL
It was only around 90deg. If it is the wax causing it, I guess it will get back to normal after a few more times on the water. No way I would wet sand. The stains in the mud holes that I boat in would never come off.
#18
Registered

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 519
Likes: 15
unscathed you may want to rethink it.
No way a cursory visual inspection by you will find slightly bent ears on the prop. Have it scanned to truly know.
You can perform a pointer test yourself but it requires a bit of set up.





