Wilson Marine Lowers, My Experience

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

12-24-2017 | 10:19 AM

#11

1 MAIDEN AMERICA

Registered

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 1,026

Likes: 16

From: Renton, Wa

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUP

It would be good comparison to new current stock untouched and undamaged drives to compare what wilson did. That would be a good apples to apples test. Just saying

after the wilson work --- Did you use the exact untouched props for the comparison ? thanks

That sounds like an offer to me. Just saying.

12-24-2017 | 06:12 PM

#12

VoodooRob

Thread Starter

VIP Member

Joined: Jul 2011

Posts: 1,992

Likes: 48

From: Cleveland Ohio

Quote:

Originally Posted by BUP

Both props were inspected by Brett at BBlades and determined to be worthless with many cracks and failed repairs. I put on a set of new stock dia. Maximus 32s with the rebuilt and trued lowers from Wilson. No way Im testing with the cracked props. We were lucky enoigh to avoid a failure. I get what your saying though.

01-26-2018 | 01:54 PM

#13

Grasspays

Registered

Joined: Nov 2017

Posts: 15

Likes: 0

Great info.

01-29-2018 | 12:11 PM

#14

FunHome

Registered

Joined: Oct 2000

Posts: 2,710

Likes: 6

From: Kansas & LOTO

Its been said that the IMCO Lowers are Faster than the Mercury Sportmaster Lowers...
Which is better to start with?? What I mean is, I have -2 Sportmaster Lowers now with the longer skeg...
Should I sell them and get a set of IMCO Lowers or send my Sportmasters to Wilson??
I wondering which would result in a higher top end speed??