Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
IMCO bearing carrier vs Mercury >

IMCO bearing carrier vs Mercury

Notices

IMCO bearing carrier vs Mercury

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-30-2017 | 04:38 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Indian Lake, Ohio
Default IMCO bearing carrier vs Mercury

I purchased a rebuilt B1 XR lower and it shipped with an IMCO bearing carrier which I'm told is a bigger bearing vs the Merc. My port side drive has a Merc carrier bearing. Will it be ok to run Merc on one side and IMCO on the other? Will I see a performance difference between the two drives? I just don't want to put this all together and then have the motors off a 100 or more RPMs from each other on top of what they are naturally (50 or so) and then not be able to send the lower back because I installed and ran it. Thoughts?
tf2ttt is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-2017 | 07:30 PM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 124
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default

I was just comparing the two yesterday. The IMCO does indeed have a bigger bearing on the prop shaft. It's about 2x's the depth as the Merc bearing. Will you notice a difference, doubt it. Is the IMCO better? I'd say yes, but by how much I don't know. I'll post a picture of the two side by side later tonight.
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-31-2017 | 06:12 AM
  #3  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,031
Likes: 10
From: westville, NJ
Default

as long as ratios and props are the same, the tiny bit of different rolling resistance between the 2 carriers will not be noticeable. people with shaft boats change 1 motor and leave other till next year. 318 on 1 side. 454 on other. same props, same trans ratio, only diff is throttle lever location when running.
dereknkathy is offline  
Reply
Old 05-31-2017 | 08:40 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Indian Lake, Ohio
Default

Yes everything else is the same. Thanks for the replies.

I'm off to sand and paint my other lower so it will look nice and shiny like my new (rebuilt) one. Hope to have everything back together and hitting the water this weekend!
tf2ttt is offline  
Reply
Old 05-31-2017 | 08:45 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Indian Lake, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by endeavour32
I was just comparing the two yesterday. The IMCO does indeed have a bigger bearing on the prop shaft. It's about 2x's the depth as the Merc bearing. Will you notice a difference, doubt it. Is the IMCO better? I'd say yes, but by how much I don't know. I'll post a picture of the two side by side later tonight.
Thanks I have them side by side so I see there is a difference. I was just more interested in performance/operation continuity between the two. Sounds like I shouldn't have any issues running Merc on one side and IMCO on the other. Thanks for the reply.
tf2ttt is offline  
Reply
Old 02-18-2018 | 09:47 PM
  #6  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,313
Likes: 24
From: medina ohio/ vermilion ohio
Default

I have one merc and one imco as will. The merc one was drilled and tapped for a prop anode but the imco is not. Why and can it be done with out messing it up.
1989mach1 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.