![]() |
Originally Posted by Apexwarrior
(Post 4718128)
Thanks for the info. I did not realize the cost differential. Also, how could they be stronger, but lack longevity as compared to the XZ's? Is the best combo then an XZ upper and an XR lower as indicated in an earlier post?
|
Originally Posted by Griff
(Post 4718194)
XR's gears have straight cut teeth that are thicker. The problem is the hardening on the gears wears faster and then when a tooth breaks it takes out the entire upper. XZ's gears don't seem to have the same issues.
the upper shaft is already the 1.25 in all X’s? Anything different in the diesel X, other than a sticker (1.5 ratio)? |
Nothing in the drive is designed with taking a hit in mind. At 500+ hp you will start to twist the splines of a standard 1” propshaft. I think an Xz would be your best choice, stronger input retainer, steel tower, helical cut upper gears with the stronger propshaft in the lower.
|
Thx to all for the great input! You’ve confirmed what the majority of my drive rebuilders told me. Many said if an XR gear fails they’d rather not reuse the housings, much more damage than the helicals typically do.
I’m going for the XZ’s. |
Here's link with the specs on all Bravo type drives https://www.go-fast.com/mercruiser_b...terndrives.htm
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.