![]() |
I think the hull is slightly different on the older ones,more wieght and different X dimension than the newer ICC's.
|
OK- The reason i ask is by the numbers reported it seems theres a -10 mph difference in top speed ?
Is this right ? My 06 496 28 ICC will run over 100mph anyday Just curious |
Originally Posted by MikaylaHunterCig
(Post 2278853)
OK- The reason i ask is by the numbers reported it seems theres a -10 mph difference in top speed ?
Is this right ? My 06 496 28 ICC will run over 100mph anyday Just curious |
Originally Posted by MikaylaHunterCig
(Post 2278853)
OK- The reason i ask is by the numbers reported it seems theres a -10 mph difference in top speed ?
Is this right ? My 06 496 28 ICC will run over 100mph anyday Just curious |
I thought the steps were smaller on the new ones and they seem to be about 10 mph faster.
|
maybe shueman can chime in and clear this up
|
X-Dimension and weight plays a huge difference in the speed differences.
A 1999 tall deck 28 took roughly 500hp per side to run 100. A 2005 ICC took roughly 425hp per side to do it. |
Originally Posted by MikaylaHunterCig
(Post 2278853)
OK- The reason i ask is by the numbers reported it seems theres a -10 mph difference in top speed ?
Is this right ? My 06 496 28 ICC will run over 100mph anyday Just curious Can you provide a few more details? Is this a carbon fiber layup? Full cabin? what drive ratio's props etc.. |
Originally Posted by QWKRN U
(Post 2279325)
Can you provide a few more details? Is this a carbon fiber layup? Full cabin? what drive ratio's props etc..
|
Originally Posted by QWKRN U
(Post 2279323)
X-Dimension and weight plays a huge difference in the speed differences.
A 1999 tall deck 28 took roughly 500hp per side to run 100. A 2005 ICC took roughly 425hp per side to do it. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.