1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
#11
Registered
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
My old 89 242SS had a 468 and it was all out at about 53MPH! I loved the boat but, no matter how I tried to figure a way to add more speed (supercharger, more cubes etc...), the cost factor just didn't make sense. So, I sold it for a 90 292SR1 w/twins and that solved my problem!
#12
Toxic FORMULA
Platinum Member
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
Originally Posted by Big Block Billy
I had a worked mag motor in mine and did 63-64 GPS.
Not enough for me. Am going with the 540, or maybe even the 598 that's all apart. Hoping to see 85Mph with the Imco shortie.... BBB
Not enough for me. Am going with the 540, or maybe even the 598 that's all apart. Hoping to see 85Mph with the Imco shortie.... BBB
#14
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
I've got a 1978 233 that I'm installing a pair of re-man merc 383's with Bravo drives. I was going to build a pair of 383's out of my old Mags but for the price of the re-man's with EFI, I couldn't go wrong.
"They" say that with CMI headers the small blocks are 350++ HP at the prop. Add a supercharger and go cat go!!
"They" say that with CMI headers the small blocks are 350++ HP at the prop. Add a supercharger and go cat go!!
#15
Registered
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
Originally Posted by Alanseattle
Ok, You've confirmed that replacing the engine will give me marginal results and be costly.
When I bought my 311 with 454 mags/Bravos top speed was 64 mph. I spent a bunch of money massaging those motors to get me to 72 - 73mph (new exhaust alone was 1800 per side). Right around the 500hp range per engine. I really needed to buy some new props with the added power but that would have been another 1000 - 1500 dollars. I already had someone wanting to buy the boat so...
As was said earlier, if you love the boat and it fits your needs it may be something you want to look into. I can fully relate to loving a Formula. After I sold my 311 I said the only 2 boats I would ever own would be another Formula or a Cigarette.
Just my .02 - Sorry for rambling
#16
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: http://www.cobaltboatsforum.com
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
Agree. I have an 81 233 with single 260 horse and 4bbl carb. It does what it I need it to but not in a hurry. It's comfy and classic instead.
I would enjoy it for a year or two then re-assess the true need to repower for the speed you're looking for. In that re-assessment you'll be able to look back on the times in which you wanted/needed more speed & power and put that against the $ to spend.
Keep in mind that the best plans will change and (normally) expectations are inversely proportional to the outcome...unless you're Cuda.
I would enjoy it for a year or two then re-assess the true need to repower for the speed you're looking for. In that re-assessment you'll be able to look back on the times in which you wanted/needed more speed & power and put that against the $ to spend.
Keep in mind that the best plans will change and (normally) expectations are inversely proportional to the outcome...unless you're Cuda.
#17
Registered
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
Originally Posted by Old floating bird
expectations are inversely proportional to the outcome
#18
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
Hey Alseattle,
A lot of good advice here. You may want to look at a built small block as a good option. Won't make it a speed demon but it will be cost effective. Depending on if you run in salt water you can go with a GM performance parts crate motor like a ZZ4. I did in my 87 F206 with great results but my 206 is almost 900 pounds lighter. The alpha will handle about any small block horsepower (thats directly from Mel Riggs mouth to my ear) but an alpha will come apart with BB torque. All I changed on the ZZ4 was the cam to a marine grind and the carb, ignition and accesories off the Merc Mag 350. Totally trouble free for over 8 years. Absolutely turn key. Also remember what everyone else is saying here. If you love the boat, you'll still be $$ ahead even with a big block conversion over the long run. Nothing else ever seems to have the staying power and longevity of the Formula's. I now own three of these dang things and the F206 is still the newest. My 02..........Al J.
A lot of good advice here. You may want to look at a built small block as a good option. Won't make it a speed demon but it will be cost effective. Depending on if you run in salt water you can go with a GM performance parts crate motor like a ZZ4. I did in my 87 F206 with great results but my 206 is almost 900 pounds lighter. The alpha will handle about any small block horsepower (thats directly from Mel Riggs mouth to my ear) but an alpha will come apart with BB torque. All I changed on the ZZ4 was the cam to a marine grind and the carb, ignition and accesories off the Merc Mag 350. Totally trouble free for over 8 years. Absolutely turn key. Also remember what everyone else is saying here. If you love the boat, you'll still be $$ ahead even with a big block conversion over the long run. Nothing else ever seems to have the staying power and longevity of the Formula's. I now own three of these dang things and the F206 is still the newest. My 02..........Al J.
#19
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
alj- did you run the aluminum heads? Angle plugs? If so, how much clearance from the boot to the manifold?
Alanseattle- the drop in re-man 383's EFI with Bravo's were $10,500.00, I think, last year from Pro-Tec Marine
Alanseattle- the drop in re-man 383's EFI with Bravo's were $10,500.00, I think, last year from Pro-Tec Marine
#20
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Deland, Florida
Posts: 25,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1986 Formula 242LS Not a fast boat
Originally Posted by twin242ls
86 242ls with twin vette motors and factory wind screen and bolsters. 65 on gps depending on the load. fun boat. "Rarebird"