![]() |
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
Between my uncle,my cousin and me we have collectively owned
8 Formulas from the mid to late80s period. They all had hook in the hull. Some much worse than others, it was designed in for some stupid reason. Answer was to pull the engines, build up the inside of the bottom and then grind the hook away. Every single one picked up 4-7mph with no other changes but a hell of alot of elbow grease to get it done. Trying to get max speed without removing the hook puts a strain on the transom. If you have someone crazy enough to video it you can actually see the transom bend as you try to trim out the hull and hook tries to push it back in. (I was young+ crazy enough to hang off the back and look, that was 20 years ago ) __________________________________________________ _____ http://www.hotrodlincoln.org/boatsig.jpg Chapparal 21XLC Merc 454/Alpha Yeah I know,but its all I can afford.. |
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
Originally Posted by Sick Stinger
Can this hull take those speed. Is it designed for that. getting it there isnt that problem just makeing sure it can take it is my though it does have tabs to obvisoly help me out its running a 496 MPI Mag i am going to Superchage just want to know if its worht it. thanks for the input if any
Mike |
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
Originally Posted by HTRDLNCN
Between my uncle,my cousin and me we have collectively owned
8 Formulas from the mid to late80s period. They all had hook in the hull. Some much worse than others, it was designed in for some stupid reason. Answer was to pull the engines, build up the inside of the bottom and then grind the hook away. Every single one picked up 4-7mph with no other changes but a hell of alot of elbow grease to get it done. Trying to get max speed without removing the hook puts a strain on the transom. If you have someone crazy enough to video it you can actually see the transom bend as you try to trim out the hull and hook tries to push it back in. (I was young+ crazy enough to hang off the back and look, that was 20 years ago |
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
on some its pretty visible even without using a straightedge ..
you can see where the strake runs flat but the bottom hooks down. Its like running with your tabs down all the time. On the earlier models there was enough meat in the hull to get rid of it without adding material but not on the late 80s models which had a lighter layup. Be coolto find someone that worked there back then and find out why they did this to their boats. I havent seen it on the 90+s or 70s models,just most of the 80s.. http://www.hotrodlincoln.org/fhook.jpg |
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
1 Attachment(s)
Just grossly overpower the boat enough and there won't be enough hook in the water at speed to make a difference :evilb: :evilb:
|
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
I'm with MOPWER or just keep the thing on the dock in the flat water. Besides 1-2 footers make speed! if the only thing in the water is the outdrive 75 shouldn't be a problem with all that power / $
|
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by HTRDLNCN
Its like running with your tabs down all the time.
|
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
Originally Posted by mopower
A single engine 242 is a bit of a different story as the balance is much better than a twin BB 272 as demonstrated in these pictures.
Fountains have the best squat in the business. My wife and I were discussing the "squat" of various go-fasters and she labeled the squat as "looking slutty". :D I like that, they look slutty! :cool: |
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
Originally Posted by ThirdBird
I like the "squat" though. Looks cool, you know there's a lot of iron back there.
Fountains have the best squat in the business. My wife and I were discussing the "squat" of various go-fasters and she labeled the squat as "looking slutty". :D I like that, they look slutty! :cool: |
Re: 242 LS Hull 75+ mph Possable
Fountain's squat is more optical illusion then anything else. They have less hull and more deck , placing the rub rail closer to the water and therefore giving the appearance of being lower :rolleyes:
I like the look too. Like you said "You know you got some iron back there" :D |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.