![]() |
382 Props: Merc vs. Hydromotive
Anybody have experience comparing the 2 with 500EFI's?
Is one faster than the other? Are the diameters interchangable/equal? Thanks. |
Thanks, Troutly
|
Re: 382 Props: Merc vs. Hydromotive
Originally Posted by TRICK
Soooo.....what were the results???
Try Julie @ Throttle Up. I got a 5 MPH higher cruise w/Hydro 4 blades. Maybe 1 MPH more top end. I never got around to trying 5 blades, but that's what the new 382's com with, so they may be better. You can borrow before you buy . . . just like Trick Marine! Right? :D :D |
Re: 382 Props: Merc vs. Hydromotive
ApachePete,
Can you give us an example of speed vs rpm at 3500 and 4000 rpm with the bravo's and the hydro's and the pitch. I have been trying a few different props and cannot beat the cruise of the 28 bravo's (50 mph @ 3500 rpm ) some of the props are five blade. Jeff |
Re: 382 Props: Merc vs. Hydromotive
Originally Posted by WAGS382
ApachePete,
Can you give us an example of speed vs rpm at 3500 and 4000 rpm with the bravo's and the hydro's and the pitch. I have been trying a few different props and cannot beat the cruise of the 28 bravo's (50 mph @ 3500 rpm ) some of the props are five blade. Jeff The boat and the data are in FL: I'm in MI. As I remember, the cruise @ 3,500 with Bravo 28's was also 50. It was 54 with Hyrdos. I don't recall speeds @ 4,000 rpm's. |
Re: 382 Props: Merc vs. Hydromotive
ApachePete,
Thanks for the info. Do you know what pitch you ended up with? Jeff |
Re: 382 Props: Merc vs. Hydromotive
Originally Posted by WAGS382
ApachePete,
Thanks for the info. Do you know what pitch you ended up with? Jeff |
Re: 382 Props: Merc vs. Hydromotive
Check with Turbosonic1 - I think he was playing around with different props on his 382 last year.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.