Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
1989 311 motor options >

1989 311 motor options

Notices
Formula

1989 311 motor options

Old 03-30-2011 | 08:15 AM
  #11  
Ted G's Avatar
Charter Member
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,663
Likes: 2
From: Edgerock Baby!!
Default

Well the 502 MPI is only 415 at the drive and it did 72 when I first got it. But after adding drive showers and the advent of ethanol fuel (both the same summer) I lost a couple. And I have not gotten the props right with the 500s. Although it does seem like you have to throw a huge amount of power at them to get anything close to 80.
__________________
Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association
www.cbpba.com
Ted G is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-2011 | 03:06 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

boat would hit 73 on gps with me and half tank of fuel.looking to get 76 to 78 we will see
highcotton is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-2011 | 03:22 PM
  #13  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

http://www.valakoraceheads.com/
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-2011 | 05:58 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default

thank you!!
highcotton is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2011 | 09:47 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by highcotton
boat would hit 73 on gps with me and half tank of fuel.looking to get 76 to 78 we will see
That sounds as an impressive speed to me with this setup, very nice.
Until the end of last year I have been running my 1989 311 SR1 with stock 454MAG's (365HP each) and bravo drives, stock mirage plus 23p and I was seeing 65MPH on GPS.
It surprises me that 2 x 415HP with TRS will give you 8mph more.
I have repowered with HP500's and I ordered a set of bravo 1 26P props at BBlades. Let's see where these will get me next month. With respect to the EFI, it is comparable with Ted's 311.
Paul311 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2011 | 06:32 PM
  #16  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

What is weird about these boats is the wide range of weight. My boat sits MUCH higher in the water then my buddies. His exhaust tips are just above the water. Mine are a good 4 or 5 inches over the water as I recall.

Paul I think what Ted stated earlier is that the 420's are rated at the prop not the crank like the 365hp motors are. So it is probably a 6-7% additional advantage.
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 09:38 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Audiofn
What is weird about these boats is the wide range of weight. My boat sits MUCH higher in the water then my buddies. His exhaust tips are just above the water. Mine are a good 4 or 5 inches over the water as I recall.

Paul I think what Ted stated earlier is that the 420's are rated at the prop not the crank like the 365hp motors are. So it is probably a 6-7% additional advantage.
Well, the difference in a full or emty tank is already close to 3 inches if I am right. I didn't know that there was so much variation in weight although I can imagine that various types of engines will differ something in weight and maybe TRS or Bravo will differ as well. Exhaust tips of my boat are also about 4-5 inches above the water with a half tank of gas.

So, are all 420's specified at the propshaft?
Paul311 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 09:43 AM
  #18  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

I always thought the older engines, like the 454/420, 454/365, etc, were rated at the crank. I think that is why the 454/365 got relabed the 350HP engine in the mid 90's.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 10:00 AM
  #19  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids MI
Default

Originally Posted by Paul311
That sounds as an impressive speed to me with this setup, very nice.
It surprises me that 2 x 415HP with TRS will give you 8mph more.
.
I agree that is a great number for TRS. i think it is gonna take at least 600 hp a side to get a TRS boat to run 80.

didn't OFFTHEFRONTS boat run like 78 with 496's and bravos?
Car Biz is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-2011 | 08:51 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: The Netherlands
Default

Originally Posted by Car Biz
I agree that is a great number for TRS. i think it is gonna take at least 600 hp a side to get a TRS boat to run 80.

didn't OFFTHEFRONTS boat run like 78 with 496's and bravos?
Yes, Offthefront had 600hp a side and his boat did about 78.
His engines were custom build if I recall well..
Paul311 is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.