Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
Outboard Powered 330 SS >

Outboard Powered 330 SS

Notices
Formula

Outboard Powered 330 SS

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-22-2019 | 01:21 AM
  #51  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 1
From: Miami Beach
Default

Hogie Roll, this is an experiment and so far is working fine but I know the numbers can improve quite a bit since everybody around is not an engineer but just handy man trying to be knowledgeable. Its amazing the lack of knowledge among the businesses doing repowers and conversions. I think I need to lower the engines several inches inn order to avoid cavitation.

fotonews is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 06:44 AM
  #52  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 420
Likes: 35
From: Michigan
Default

Nice project, and it sure didn’t take long.
Alwhite00 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 08:34 AM
  #53  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 1
From: Miami Beach
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll
If that is consumption at 42, it’s very good. These things are gas hogs, prob like 1.3 with 454s.

If that’s wot, you need less pitch. I think they redline at 6600-6800. You could also try raising them
Hey hoggie roll, you say raise them, I thought lowering them since I get a bit of cavitation. What do you think? WOT is 54mph at 6000 rpm's.
fotonews is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 08:52 AM
  #54  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 1
From: Navarre, FL
Default

This is really cool, if you are getting 1.6 mpg at 42 mph that is awesome. My 330 with 496's was at 1 mpg no matter what. you just picked up a ton of range... What is the plan for the engine compartment?
alindquist is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 08:58 AM
  #55  
rak rua's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 1,242
From: Thailand
Default

Originally Posted by fotonews
Hey hoggie roll, you say raise them, I thought lowering them since I get a bit of cavitation. What do you think? WOT is 54mph at 6000 rpm's.
He may have thought the slower figures (42 mph) was WOT, I wasn't too sure but you've cleared that up now.
The figure of 54 mph @ 6,000 revs is pretty impressive. There might be more in it if you can get the revs up a little by playing with engine height and maybe props. Depends what you're looking for but I'd say you've done very well for a first run.

RR
rak rua is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 09:19 AM
  #56  
Mentalpause's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,949
Likes: 93
From: IL...XLOTO
Default

Originally Posted by rak rua
He may have thought the slower figures (42 mph) was WOT, I wasn't too sure but you've cleared that up now.
The figure of 54 mph @ 6,000 revs is pretty impressive. There might be more in it if you can get the revs up a little by playing with engine height and maybe props. Depends what you're looking for but I'd say you've done very well for a first run.

RR
Agree with RR. I'm impressed with the numbers you are at. 1.6 at 42 is very good. Great job.
Mentalpause is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 03:22 PM
  #57  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by fotonews
Hey hoggie roll, you say raise them, I thought lowering them since I get a bit of cavitation. What do you think? WOT is 54mph at 6000 rpm's.
Thats a pretty good WOT number, but the engines can spin faster.

Are the engines cavitating at WOT? Or just when accelerating?

Mine will cavitate if I go WOT from low speed. I just manage it with less throttle. But I still have great acceleration regardless of this. My boat is probably 2k lbs lighter though.

Did you trim them up a lot while testing? Like until it slowed down?
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 03:58 PM
  #58  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

I’m forgetting this is a 280, not a 330. there should be something more speed in there.

im on the west side right now, but possibly heading over there is the next few days. I could stop by and check it out. Are you spinning out or in?
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 06:59 PM
  #59  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 848
Likes: 19
From: Mobile, Al
Default

Picture above appears to be spinning out. Also I'd like to bring up that you are running 3 blades. We are rigging the contender out with the same engines in the upcoming weeks. Already have a set of merc revolutions here for them when engines arrive. The 4 blades would really help you on the hole shot.
Redneckcustoms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2019 | 09:45 PM
  #60  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 797
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Redneckcustoms13
Picture above appears to be spinning out. Also I'd like to bring up that you are running 3 blades. We are rigging the contender out with the same engines in the upcoming weeks. Already have a set of merc revolutions here for them when engines arrive. The 4 blades would really help you on the hole shot.
Zuke props have a big diameter
hogie roll is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.