Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Formula
Opions on 02 Fastech 312 with 350 Mags >

Opions on 02 Fastech 312 with 350 Mags

Notices
Formula

Opions on 02 Fastech 312 with 350 Mags

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-18-2015 | 08:39 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 141
Likes: 3
From: Cedarburg,Wi.
Default

So you have the 292. Do you confirm that this boat struggles to get on plain or takes longer,heavier or what??
drumerjb is offline  
Reply
Old 07-18-2015 | 08:40 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 141
Likes: 3
From: Cedarburg,Wi.
Default

Originally Posted by looseconnection
Some say it is no big deal but, we could honestly use BBC power in the 292's. It will be a slug out of the hole and if you buy it forget selling it, hard to give away a power boat now.
So you have the 292. Do you confirm that this boat struggles to get on plain or takes longer,heavier or what?? Sorry for the double post. I m learning..
drumerjb is offline  
Reply
Old 07-19-2015 | 09:44 AM
  #13  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 19
From: Washington, MO
Default

I have a 2006 292 with 6.2's, K-Planes turning 28" Bravos and it planes fine and runs 70 mph.

Regarding mpg, that 2.8 mpg you refer to in the original post is surprising. My twin stepped 292 averages 1.8-2.2 mpg from 40-60 mph. 2.8 mpg seems high for a couple big blocks pushing a heavier hull.
4mulafastech is offline  
Reply
Old 07-19-2015 | 10:19 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 3
From: Tonawanda NY
Default

Move on, however if your willing to top out at 60/62 I would save 15/20k and buy a nice SR1, otherwise I would hold out for 454's I know of one for sale, its mint, and runs 70,

I know this boat its mint,

http://www.boattrader.com/listing/19...Tech-102532512

Also like this,

http://www.boattrader.com/listing/19...ech-312-659041
88242LS is offline  
Reply
Old 07-19-2015 | 10:23 AM
  #15  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 19
From: Washington, MO
Default

Well I knew something with that 312 mpg was off. The engineer in me got me digging and I found the Boat Test article and it looks like they made a mistake. Check out the chart attached. They apparently list the mpg based on only one engine consuming fuel, but the graph is correct. The secondary axis shows actual mpg using two engines and it is the same as the listed mpg divided by two. I agree with the numbers in the graph.

Newer 292 hulls are more fuel efficient. Not that it really matters since fuel is the least expense when it comes to boat ownership. Good luck on your search!
Attached Thumbnails Opions on 02 Fastech 312 with 350 Mags-pic.jpg  
4mulafastech is offline  
Reply
Old 07-19-2015 | 11:23 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 2
From: Great Sacandaga Lake, NY
Default

BUY IT. Run it like you stole it and when the engines get tired, replace them with Big Blocks 600HP a side..
Rattlesnake Jake is offline  
Reply
Old 07-19-2015 | 05:36 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
From: Sweet Home, North Alabama and Orange Beach
Default

Originally Posted by drumerjb
So you have the 292. Do you confirm that this boat struggles to get on plain or takes longer,heavier or what?? Sorry for the double post. I m learning..
Yes I have the 292. Like most perf boats that are propped for the big end it struggles out of the hole. Struggles may be the wrong word but it does take some time to get on plane. I drove a 312 with 454mpis before my 292 purchase and the boat did well but I feel that the 292 is a bit sportier.
looseconnection is offline  
Reply
Old 07-19-2015 | 07:06 PM
  #18  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 7
From: new england
Default

my 292 has the 6.2. it is slow out of the hole loaded with fuel and people. but still does not need tabs to get up and going. Normal usage is half tank and two adults two kids and she gets right up and goes. I looked at 312'sthd extra fuel for the BB's to gain 1 mph made no sense. The 292 is the reason the 312 is gone. And that ask price is BB money.
twin242ls is offline  
Reply
Old 07-19-2015 | 11:23 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 2
From: Coal City ,IL
Default

Originally Posted by 4mulafastech
. Not that it really matters since fuel is the least expense when it comes to boat ownership. Good luck on your search!


I must be doing it wrong..... Cuz that is the most expense for me......
mptrimshop is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2015 | 07:23 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
From: Sweet Home, North Alabama and Orange Beach
Default

Originally Posted by mptrimshop
I must be doing it wrong..... Cuz that is the most expense for me......
you have burnt more in fuel cost than the purchase price of the boat?????
looseconnection is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.