Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
35 vs 38 lightning's >

35 vs 38 lightning's

Notices

35 vs 38 lightning's

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-13-2005 | 02:41 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 521
Likes: 1
From: Fort Erie Ontario Canada
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

If you get a 38 you should to get 2000 or newer, older tham that the boats looked dated, just sold my 98 32, came very close to deal with 98 38, with 500's backed out last min., because steps are still same as 95 and still has dated air vents in motar compartment, doen't get me wrong still nice boat but if I am to move up in size I think you should go for the latest hull. I am leaning twords a 35 98 or 99 because of step
JMPH is offline  
Reply
Old 11-13-2005 | 09:46 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

The 35 Lighting does it for me
JeffVan is offline  
Reply
Old 11-13-2005 | 09:51 PM
  #13  
Jonas's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Vallarta Mx, Lake tahoe Ca,
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

go for the big step like mine if you want i will sell u mine...
it roars,,, its seen 106+ on gps!!


Originally Posted by JMPH
If you get a 38 you should to get 2000 or newer, older tham that the boats looked dated, just sold my 98 32, came very close to deal with 98 38, with 500's backed out last min., because steps are still same as 95 and still has dated air vents in motar compartment, doen't get me wrong still nice boat but if I am to move up in size I think you should go for the latest hull. I am leaning twords a 35 98 or 99 because of step
Jonas is offline  
Reply
Old 11-15-2005 | 06:53 PM
  #14  
tnothin's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Hey Jonas is your boat red and gold? And did you by it from Rod at Honker Cut?
tnothin is offline  
Reply
Old 11-15-2005 | 06:59 PM
  #15  
Downtown42's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 9,950
Likes: 0
From: 1 Flu Ovr KuKos Nest-WI
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

I tink Fastboats.com...Randy Sweers S FL
Downtown42 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-15-2005 | 07:02 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

i think your suggestions from others will be most important if you include the amt. of $ you are willing to spend. i have driven every size fountain there is. (except for the few 65's) personally the 42 is by far a more sought after boat and will only the the dream of many. if comfort is the major issue, then try to get one. otherwise the 38 is my choice for the ride, but the 35 is the better looking boat with the race-fairing.
PurpleStuff is offline  
Reply
Old 11-21-2005 | 06:32 PM
  #17  
Jonas's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Vallarta Mx, Lake tahoe Ca,
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Originally Posted by tnothin
Hey Jonas is your boat red and gold? And did you by it from Rod at Honker Cut?
no
see pics above,,
its blues and black silvers
thanks
Jonas is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2005 | 08:32 AM
  #18  
Single With Twins's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Orangeville, ONT. CAN
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

If money isn't a concern but ride is most important then why not a 47 with race faring and a pair of fully staggered 900's or something like that? You not going to have a problem with any water, runs great in calm water easy to get on plain, no more difficult to dock then a 42 (easier in my opinion, more weight). Trailering can be a bit of a hastly but well worth it if you do not have to move very often and you can have it delivered to where you want it too. Just a thought, my ultimate would be the new 47 vacuum packed hull with staggered 1075's.

Now i need to find the $$$$$$$$$$
Single With Twins is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2005 | 11:43 AM
  #19  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 393
From: Indianapolis, Lake Cumberland
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

Originally Posted by Single With Twins
If money isn't a concern but ride is most important then why not a 47 with race faring and a pair of fully staggered 900's or something like that? You not going to have a problem with any water, runs great in calm water easy to get on plain, no more difficult to dock then a 42 (easier in my opinion, more weight). Trailering can be a bit of a hastly but well worth it if you do not have to move very often and you can have it delivered to where you want it too. Just a thought, my ultimate would be the new 47 vacuum packed hull with staggered 1075's.

Now i need to find the $$$$$$$$$$

The two people I've known who had 47's hated them. They are wave crushers but they just don't give you the Ferrari sports car feel like the other Fountains. Both people got rid of them fast. These were 1999 and 2001 models - I have no idea if they ride different now.
Marginmn is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2005 | 09:31 AM
  #20  
Single With Twins's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Orangeville, ONT. CAN
Default Re: 35 vs 38 lightning's

you are correct the 47 deffinately has a more solid in the water ride then the 42 etc. From what i have run and noticed though the 47's with triple 500's etc you get that "crushing" ride but when you have some bigger power you start to get the 42 feeling a bit more.
Single With Twins is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.