Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER! >

35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

Notices

35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-30-2006 | 11:26 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Westmont, IL
Default 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

I am a Lake Michigan boater and I have had several Fountains in the past 38 Fever twin,42 Lightning Triple,47 Lightning Triple.
I am in the market again and wanted something more TRAILERABLE this time. I am considering the 35 but not sure if it is worth the extra clams for the Lightning.
I loved my 38 because it was so SOLID. The 42 and 47 were GREAT boats but had a bit more HULL FLEX THAN I LIKED.
I think the 35 will be a really FUN boat that we can use on Lake Michigan and tow it elsewhere for a vacation as well.
Let me know your thoughts as I have NEVER even been in a 35 before.
Jackhammer
Jackhammer405 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-2006 | 05:55 AM
  #2  
blownincome's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 5
From: Epping N.H.
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

35/38 Are My Wepons of Choice! I have a 35 non step And She is awesome in the Rough Stuff.also Like the 38 .. The 42 is a little harder to find dock space on the Lake. so I prefer the 35 or 38..
blownincome is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-2006 | 08:23 AM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 393
From: Indianapolis, Lake Cumberland
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

I've driven both and just prefer the feel of the classic, the looks of it, and the cockpit layout. Both are great boats though
Marginmn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-2006 | 09:40 AM
  #4  
10x's Avatar
10x
10x
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 2
From: La Grange Ill
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

John, I like both models, but I guess I'm a little more favored toward the old school look of the executioner style. There's gonna be a noticable difference in the ride for you going down from a 47 to the 35. But, then again the 35 is much more trailerable.

I was up in Waukegon at Shogren Performance Marine a couple times last week and he has a few new 35's in there that are really sharp. He's also got a few really clean lookin used ones in there too. It seems like Scott gets new boats in there everytime I stop in there.

Frank
__________________
Fountain powerboats rule "The Preacher"
Chicago Powerboat Club Director
[email protected]
www.chicagopowerboat.com
10x is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-2006 | 04:11 PM
  #5  
Rebel_Heart's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
From: LOTO
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

I've not been in a twin step 35, but I do love my 35 single step Classic. Guess I'm a purist, I really like the look of the Executioner vs. the newer style Lightning.
Rebel_Heart is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-2006 | 07:26 PM
  #6  
carney's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: FINGER LAKES N.Y.
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

I have a single step 35 with 525SC's and have one hell of a good time with it. some of the gas stations are not big enough to get in , but you should see the people look when I manage to get to the pump.
carney is offline  
Reply
Old 05-07-2006 | 11:27 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Westmont, IL
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

Frank,
Thanks for the advice!! I realize the 35 won't be like my 47 and I don't expect it to be.
Docking,trailering and Rack storing are important to me. The worst part of the 47 was that they could not rack store it.
I have never owned a 35 yet and I have always wanted one. I think it will be a great HANDLING boat. Kind of like a sports car.

John

Last edited by Jackhammer405; 05-08-2006 at 07:18 PM.
Jackhammer405 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-2006 | 10:12 AM
  #8  
10x's Avatar
10x
10x
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 2
From: La Grange Ill
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

John, you'll have fun in a 35, PLUS !!! you'll have more "air" time.
__________________
Fountain powerboats rule "The Preacher"
Chicago Powerboat Club Director
[email protected]
www.chicagopowerboat.com
10x is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-2006 | 04:24 PM
  #9  
FeverMike's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 9
From: Tampa
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

The 35 twin step has a much deeper and more roomy cockpit than the 35 Classic. The 35 twin step is also faster and will probably get better gas mileage than a 35 Classic. As far as handling goes...well...from my experiance and knowning some racers the 35 twin step is better in the rough than the 35 Classic. All the F2 teams that ran a 35 ran the 35 twin step.
FeverMike is offline  
Reply
Old 05-08-2006 | 07:36 PM
  #10  
ReggieRaft's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Oakland N.J.
Default Re: 35 Executioner OR 35 Lightning better in ROUGH WATER!

My 35 works will in heavy stuff. But I did switch to 380 tabs you can push the nose down .
ReggieRaft is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.